These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16842458)

  • 1. Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance.
    Harewood GC; Petersen BT; Ott BJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Jul; 24(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 16842458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores.
    Lin OS; Kozarek RA; Arai A; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Kowdley KV; McCormick SE; Schembre DB; Soon MS; Dominitz JA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jun; 71(7):1253-9. PubMed ID: 20598251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.
    Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
    Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
    Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality and safety issues in procedural rural practice: a prospective evaluation of current quality and safety guidelines in 3000 colonoscopies.
    Azzopardi J; DeWitt DE
    Rural Remote Health; 2012; 12():1949. PubMed ID: 22985075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Impact assessment of increasing the time of withdrawal of colonoscopy in the detection rate of polyps in our midst].
    Velásquez J; Espinoza-Ríos J; Huerta-Mercado J; Pinto J; De los Ríos R; Piscoya A; OR C; Zegarra A; Bussalleu A
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2009; 29(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 20066016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection.
    Sawhney MS; Cury MS; Neeman N; Ngo LH; Lewis JM; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK; Aronson MD
    Gastroenterology; 2008 Dec; 135(6):1892-8. PubMed ID: 18835390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study.
    Shah HA; Paszat LF; Saskin R; Stukel TA; Rabeneck L
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 132(7):2297-303. PubMed ID: 17570204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy.
    Bhangu A; Bowley DM; Horner R; Baranowski E; Raman S; Karandikar S
    Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1436-44. PubMed ID: 22961527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment.
    Overholt BF; Brooks-Belli L; Grace M; Rankin K; Harrell R; Turyk M; Rosenberg FB; Barish RW; Gilinsky NH;
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Apr; 44(4):e80-6. PubMed ID: 19881361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy.
    Hoff G; Bretthauer M; Dahler S; Huppertz-Hauss G; Sauar J; Paulsen J; Seip B; Moritz V
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):885-9. PubMed ID: 17558914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.
    Imperiali G; Minoli G; Meucci GM; Spinzi G; Strocchi E; Terruzzi V; Radaelli F
    Endoscopy; 2007 Apr; 39(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 17273959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colonoscopy audit over 10 years--what can be learnt?
    Fraser AG; Gamble GD; Rose TR; Dunn JP
    N Z Med J; 2013 Sep; 126(1382):25-35. PubMed ID: 24154767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of screening colonoscopy competency in colon and rectal surgery fellows: a single institution experience.
    Selvasekar CR; Holubar SD; Pendlimari R; Kennedy GD; Harmsen WS; Harrington JR; Nelson H
    J Surg Res; 2012 May; 174(1):e17-23. PubMed ID: 22225979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved colorectal adenoma detection with a transparent retractable extension device.
    Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 103(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 18076740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
    Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T
    Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a colonoscopy simulation model for skills assessment.
    Sedlack RE; Baron TH; Downing SM; Schwartz AJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 17100968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
    Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.