135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16842551)
1. Retrospective evaluation of the consequence of alleged patch test sensitization.
Jensen CD; Paulsen E; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jul; 55(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 16842551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Late reactions in patch tests: a 4-year review from a clinic of occupational dermatology.
Aalto-Korte K; Alanko K; Kuuliala O; Jolanki R
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 17244075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allergic skin disease: investigation of both immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity is essential.
Usmani N; Wilkinson SM
Clin Exp Allergy; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1541-6. PubMed ID: 17883733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromo glutaronitrile--clinical cases from 2003.
Zachariae C; Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 15701121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which children should we patch test?
Beattie PE; Green C; Lowe G; Lewis-Jones MS
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2007 Jan; 32(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17004990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Allergic contact dermatitis in 136 children patch tested between 2000 and 2006.
Hammonds LM; Hall VC; Yiannias JA
Int J Dermatol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 19261015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thimerosal allergy and clinical relevance in Thailand.
Wattanakrai P; Rajatanavin N
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Sep; 90(9):1775-9. PubMed ID: 17957918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature.
de Waard-van der Spek FB; Oranje AP
Dermatology; 2009; 218(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 18946202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Epicutaneous sensitization to metals and contact allergic dermatitis: analysis of an ambulatory caseload].
Candura SM; Verni P; Dellabianca A; Biale C; Perfetti L; Calcagno G; Pisati A; Moscato G
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 1999; 21(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 10771716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact and aeroallergens in adulthood atopic dermatitis.
Pónyai G; Hidvégi B; Németh I; Sas A; Temesvári E; Kárpáti S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2008 Nov; 22(11):1346-55. PubMed ID: 18680530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primin in the European standard patch test series for 20 years.
Zachariae C; Engkilde K; Johansen JD; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):344-6. PubMed ID: 17577376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The profile of patch test reactions to common contact allergens is related to sex.
Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jan; 58(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 18154557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical expression of nickel contact dermatitis primed by diagnostic patch test.
Theler B; Bucher C; French LE; Ballmer Weber B; Hofbauer GF
Dermatology; 2009; 219(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 19349696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Allergic contact eczema from shellac and 1,3-butylene glycol in an eyeliner].
Magerl A; Pirker C; Frosch PJ
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2003 Apr; 1(4):300-2. PubMed ID: 16285485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In pursuit of defining clinical relevance of positive patch tests results.
Wolf R; Davidovici B; Stone SP; Tuzun Y
Clin Dermatol; 2007; 25(5):493-4. PubMed ID: 17870528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. p-Phenylenediamine sensitization is more prevalent in central and southern European patch test centres than in Scandinavian: results from a multicentre study.
Thyssen JP; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Diepgen T; Giménez-Arnau AM; Gonçalo M; Goossens A; Le Coz C; McFadden J; Rustemeyer T; White IR; White JM; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jun; 60(6):314-9. PubMed ID: 19489965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patch testing with components of water-based metalworking fluids: results of a multicentre study with a second series.
Geier J; Lessmann H; Becker D; Bruze M; Frosch PJ; Fuchs T; Jappe U; Koch P; Pföhler C; Skudlik C
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):322-9. PubMed ID: 17101005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
