These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16842789)
1. Cesarean section by choice: constructing a reproductive rights framework for the debate. Christilaw JE Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Sep; 94(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 16842789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean section without clinical indication versus vaginal delivery as a paradigmatic model in the discourse of medical setting decisions. Demontis R; Pisu S; Pintor M; D'aloja E J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1470-5. PubMed ID: 21158491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ethics of cesarean section on maternal request: a feminist critique of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' position on patient-choice surgery. Bergeron V Bioethics; 2007 Nov; 21(9):478-87. PubMed ID: 17927624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ACOG committee opinion. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making. Number 289, November 2003. ACOG Committee on Ethics Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Feb; 84(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 14997900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale. Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Gamble JA; Creedy DK Birth; 2000 Dec; 27(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 11251511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The professional responsibility model of respect for autonomy in decision making about cesarean delivery. Chervenak FA; McCullough LB Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 22694022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. On the cutting edge: ethical responsiveness to cesarean rates. Burrow S Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):44-52. PubMed ID: 22694036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's Rights in the Health Care System: Caesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. Larsen AC J Law Med; 2018 Feb; 25(2):448-464. PubMed ID: 29978647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-choice vaginal delivery? Leeman LM; Plante LA Ann Fam Med; 2006; 4(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 16735530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproductive rights and the medical care system: a plea for rational health policy. Stephenson PA; Wagner MG J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 8408608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethics and "cesarean delivery on maternal demand". Latham SR; Norwitz ER Semin Perinatol; 2009 Dec; 33(6):405-9. PubMed ID: 19914526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obstetricians' opinions regarding patient choice in cesarean delivery. Gonen R; Tamir A; Degani S Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Apr; 99(4):577-80. PubMed ID: 12039114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean by choice? Empirical study of public attitudes. Högberg U; Lynöe N; Wulff M Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(12):1301-8. PubMed ID: 18972235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal and neonatal complications. Lee YM; D'Alton ME Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 20(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 18989137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the relevance of women's sexual and reproductive rights to the practising obstetrician/gynaecologist? Shaw D; Faúndes A Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jun; 20(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 16563873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]