These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16842899)

  • 21. Cuspal flexure, depth-of-cure, and bond integrity of bulk-fill composites.
    Do T; Church B; Veríssimo C; Hackmyer SP; Tantbirojn D; Simon JF; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(7):468-73. PubMed ID: 25514074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Cuspal Deflection and Microleakage of Premolar Teeth restored with Three Restorative Materials.
    Yarmohamadi E; Jahromi PR; Akbarzadeh M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):684-689. PubMed ID: 29959297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of soft-start vs continuous-light polymerization on microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations.
    Nalçaci A; Salbaş M; Ulusoy N
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 16430012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N; Korkmaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage of different resin composite types.
    Yazici AR; Celik C; Ozgünaltay G
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):790-4. PubMed ID: 15553287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities.
    Ozel E; Soyman M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19363973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
    Kim ME; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of LED curing modes on cusp deflection and hardness of composite restorations.
    Alomari QD; Mansour YF
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):684-9. PubMed ID: 16382590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 14653293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlation between the amount of linear polymerization shrinkage and cuspal deflection.
    Lee SY; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 16802645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of using silorane-based resin composite for restoring conservative cavities on the changes in cuspal deflection.
    Shabayek NM; Hassan FM; Mobarak EH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):E1-8. PubMed ID: 23088187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Role of delayed light polymerization of a dual-cured composite base on marginal adaptation of class II posterior composite open-sandwich restoration.
    Kamath U; Sheth H;
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):296. PubMed ID: 22945734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of accelerated restorative techniques on the microleakage of Class II composites.
    Uctasli S; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 12469751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A; Ghosn C; Khraisat A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):29-37. PubMed ID: 20069964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
    Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of delayed light curing on the cuspal deflection and microleakage of a dual-cured composite resin in Class 2 restorations.
    Essi R; Spraul M; Vach K; Hahn P
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 30720021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.