282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16843678)
1. Sensitivity analysis of misclassification: a graphical and a Bayesian approach.
Chu H; Wang Z; Cole SR; Greenland S
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):834-41. PubMed ID: 16843678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Curious phenomena in Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification.
Gustafson P; Greenland S
Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 16220473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables.
Fox MP; Lash TL; Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 34(6):1370-6. PubMed ID: 16172102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Bayesian approach to prospective binary outcome studies with misclassification in a binary risk factor.
Prescott GJ; Garthwaite PH
Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3463-77. PubMed ID: 16237661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nondifferential disease misclassification may bias incidence risk ratios away from the null.
Pekkanen J; Sunyer J; Chinn S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 16488359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Misclassification in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions: assessment of bias and sample size.
Garcia-Closas M; Rothman N; Lubin J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Dec; 8(12):1043-50. PubMed ID: 10613335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of sensitivity-specificity imputation, direct imputation and fully Bayesian analysis to adjust for exposure misclassification when validation data are unavailable.
Corbin M; Haslett S; Pearce N; Maule M; Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 46(3):1063-1072. PubMed ID: 28338966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research: III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods.
Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 38(6):1662-73. PubMed ID: 19744933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer.
Steenland K; Greenland S
Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 160(4):384-92. PubMed ID: 15286024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accounting for error due to misclassification of exposures in case-control studies of gene-environment interaction.
Zhang L; Mukherjee B; Ghosh M; Gruber S; Moreno V
Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2756-83. PubMed ID: 17879261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods to apply probabilistic bias analysis to summary estimates of association.
Lash TL; Schmidt M; Jensen AØ; Engebjerg MC
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Jun; 19(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 20535760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Varied forms of bias due to nondifferential error in measuring exposure.
Brenner H; Loomis D
Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 7986865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian modelling of lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure adjusted for unmeasured confounding by smoking.
de Vocht F; Kromhout H; Ferro G; Boffetta P; Burstyn I
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Aug; 66(8):502-8. PubMed ID: 19060029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accounting for independent nondifferential misclassification does not increase certainty that an observed association is in the correct direction.
Greenland S; Gustafson P
Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 164(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 16641307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple model for potential use with a misclassified binary outcome in epidemiology.
Duffy SW; Warwick J; Williams AR; Keshavarz H; Kaffashian F; Rohan TE; Nili F; Sadeghi-Hassanabadi A
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):712-7. PubMed ID: 15252078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of misclassification on estimates of relative risk in family history studies.
Szatmari P; Jones MB
Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(4):368-81. PubMed ID: 10207718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian analysis of a matched case-control study with expert prior information on both the misclassification of exposure and the exposure-disease association.
Liu J; Gustafson P; Cherry N; Burstyn I
Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(27):3411-23. PubMed ID: 19691019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the association between statin and fracture: a Bayesian consideration.
Nguyen ND; Wang CY; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
Bone; 2007 Apr; 40(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 17178257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust bayesian sensitivity analysis for case-control studies with uncertain exposure misclassification probabilities.
Mak TS; Best N; Rushton L
Int J Biostat; 2015 May; 11(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 25720128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
