1465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16844212)
1. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics.
Dündar M; Ozcan M; Gökçe B; Cömlekoğlu E; Leite F; Valandro LF
Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16844212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of bond strength of various margin ceramics to a zirconia ceramic.
Cömlekoğlu ME; Dündar M; Ozcan M; Güngör MA; Gökçe B; Artunç C
J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):822-7. PubMed ID: 18620791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of surface-conditioning methods on shear bond strength of brackets bonded to different all-ceramic materials.
Saraç YŞ; Külünk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Saraç D; Türk T
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 21228120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning.
Amaral R; Ozcan M; Bottino MA; Valandro LF
Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 16039705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials.
Kim BK; Bae HE; Shim JS; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 16198173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of veneering ceramics to zirconia.
Ozkurt Z; Kazazoglu E; Unal A
Dent Mater J; 2010 Mar; 29(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 20379023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of different etching times of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the shear bond strength of high-leucite ceramics bonded to composite resin.
Kukiattrakoon B; Thammasitboon K
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17631170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions.
Brentel AS; Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Alarça LG; Amaral R; Bottino MA
Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1323-31. PubMed ID: 17188745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of surface acid etching on the biaxial flexural strength of two hot-pressed glass ceramics.
Hooshmand T; Parvizi S; Keshvad A
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 18482364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations.
Aboushelib MN; de Jager N; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
Dent Mater; 2005 Oct; 21(10):984-91. PubMed ID: 16085302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of die spacer thickness on shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers.
Cho SH; Chang WG; Lim BS; Lee YK
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 16543017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flexural strength of glass-infiltrated zirconia/alumina-based ceramics and feldspathic veneering porcelains.
Bottino MA; Salazar-Marocho SM; Leite FP; Vásquez VC; Valandro LF
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 19432762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations.
Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Sindel J
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 11203818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of an indirect metal ceramic repair system.
Fahmy NZ; Mohsen CA
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jan; 19(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 19754646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system.
Petridis H; Garefis P; Hirayama H; Kafantaris NM; Koidis PT
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 14714844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
