375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16844319)
1. The value of digital rectal examination as a predictor of prostate cancer diagnosis among United States Veterans referred for prostate biopsy.
Issa MM; Zasada W; Ward K; Hall JA; Petros JA; Ritenour CW; Goodman M; Kleinbaum D; Mandel J; Marshall FF
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 16844319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL.
Bozeman CB; Carver BS; Caldito G; Venable DD; Eastham JA
Urology; 2005 Oct; 66(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 16230142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multicenter study on the detection of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen in men with or without urinary symptoms. Cooperative Group for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.
Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 9286642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason > or =7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 790 men.
Borden LS; Wright JL; Kim J; Latchamsetty K; Porter CR
BJU Int; 2007 Mar; 99(3):559-63. PubMed ID: 17155976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of transperineal six-core prostate biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination findings.
Luciani LG; De Giorgi G; Valotto C; Zanin M; Bierti S; Zattoni F
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):555-8. PubMed ID: 16527579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The digital rectal examination (DRE) remains important - outcomes from a contemporary cohort of men undergoing an initial 12-18 core prostate needle biopsy.
Palmerola R; Smith P; Elliot V; Reese CT; Mahon FB; Harpster LE; Icitovic N; Raman JD
Can J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):6542-7. PubMed ID: 23228289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The general practitioner's part in the initiation of diagnostic procedures in prostate cancer].
Braun KP; May M; Grassmel Y; Führer S; Hoschke B; Braun V
Aktuelle Urol; 2008 Mar; 39(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18379968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital rectal examination as a prostate cancer-screening method in a country with a low incidence of prostate cancer.
Shim HB; Lee SE; Park HK; Ku JH
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2007; 10(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17297501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is a digital rectal examination necessary in the diagnosis and clinical staging of early prostate cancer?
Philip J; Dutta Roy S; Ballal M; Foster CS; Javlé P
BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):969-71. PubMed ID: 15839915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in early detection of prostate cancer.
Galić J; Karner I; Cenan L; Tucak A; Hegedus I; Pasini J; Bilandzija-Peranović M; Mihaljević S
Coll Antropol; 2003; 27 Suppl 1():61-6. PubMed ID: 12955893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 18423977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of free and total prostate specific antigen in identifying patients for prostatic biopsy and its relationship to Gleason score and number of positive cores.
Bulbul MA; Khauli RB; Nasr R; Hemady K; Wazzan W
J Med Liban; 2000; 48(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 11028151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer risk with positive family history, normal prostate examination findings, and PSA less than 4.0 ng/mL.
Canby-Hagino E; Hernandez J; Brand TC; Troyer DA; Higgins B; Ankerst DP; Thompson IM; Leach RJ; Parekh DJ
Urology; 2007 Oct; 70(4):748-52. PubMed ID: 17991549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in detecting carcinoma prostate.
Iqbal N; Bhatti AN; Husain S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Jun; 13(6):340-2. PubMed ID: 12814533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive modeling for the presence of prostate carcinoma using clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound parameters in patients with prostate specific antigen levels < or = 10 ng/mL.
Garzotto M; Hudson RG; Peters L; Hsieh YC; Barrera E; Mori M; Beer TM; Klein T
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 98(7):1417-22. PubMed ID: 14508828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of prostate cancer for patients receiving finasteride: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.
Thompson IM; Pauler Ankerst D; Chi C; Goodman PJ; Tangen CM; Lippman SM; Lucia MS; Parnes HL; Coltman CA
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jul; 25(21):3076-81. PubMed ID: 17634486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection rate of prostate cancer according to prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in Korean men: a nationwide multicenter study.
Seo HK; Chung MK; Ryu SB; Lee KH;
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1109-12. PubMed ID: 18158028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital rectal examination is barrier to population-based prostate cancer screening.
Nagler HM; Gerber EW; Homel P; Wagner JR; Norton J; Lebovitch S; Phillips JL
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1137-40. PubMed ID: 15922431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. History of malignancy is a predictor of prostate cancer detection: incorporation into a pre-biopsy nomogram.
Kawakami S; Koga F; Fujii Y; Saito K; Yamamoto S; Tatokoro M; Yonese J; Kageyama Y; Fukui I; Kihara K
Int J Urol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1055-60. PubMed ID: 19054174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: the impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; van der Kwast TH; Schröder FH
Prostate; 2007 Feb; 67(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 17044079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
