BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16844448)

  • 1. Ureteral stents: coil strength and durometer.
    Hendlin K; Dockendorf K; Horn C; Pshon N; Lund B; Monga M
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 16844448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wire-based ureteral stents: impact on tensile strength and compression.
    Pedro RN; Hendlin K; Kriedberg C; Monga M
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1057-9. PubMed ID: 18158013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of ureteral stent compression.
    Hendlin K; Vedula K; Horn C; Monga M
    Urology; 2006 Apr; 67(4):679-82. PubMed ID: 16600353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New metallic ureteral stents: improved tensile strength and resistance to extrinsic compression.
    Hendlin K; Korman E; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2012 Mar; 26(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 22011000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uropathogen interaction with the surface of urological stents using different surface properties.
    Lange D; Elwood CN; Choi K; Hendlin K; Monga M; Chew BH
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1194-200. PubMed ID: 19625060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of ureteral stent compression force and its role in malignant obstruction.
    Christman MS; L'esperance JO; Choe CH; Stroup SP; Auge BK
    J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):392-6. PubMed ID: 19010490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loss of structural integrity of a coil based ureteral stent.
    Sweeney DD; Hayn MH; Ricchiuti D; Jackman SV
    Can J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(4):4750-2; discussion 4752. PubMed ID: 19671229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Next generation biodegradable ureteral stent in a yucatan pig model.
    Chew BH; Lange D; Paterson RF; Hendlin K; Monga M; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):765-71. PubMed ID: 20022028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.
    Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Farhat WA; Bägli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1693-8; discussion1698-9. PubMed ID: 18708220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alfuzosin to relieve ureteral stent discomfort: a prospective, randomized, placebo controlled study.
    Beddingfield R; Pedro RN; Hinck B; Kreidberg C; Feia K; Monga M
    J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 19013590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of double J stent in a case of spontaneous ureteral extravasation of urine.
    Ertuğrul A; Yücel S; Ilker Y; Akdaş A
    Arch Esp Urol; 2000 Jun; 53(5):491-3. PubMed ID: 10961018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technology insight: Novel ureteral stent materials and designs.
    Chew BH; Denstedt JD
    Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2004 Nov; 1(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 16474466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical performance of polyurethane ureteral stents in vitro and ex vivo.
    Gorman SP; Jones DS; Bonner MC; Akay M; Keane PF
    Biomaterials; 1997 Oct; 18(20):1379-83. PubMed ID: 9363338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of stents on urological complications and health care expenditure in renal transplant recipients: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Tavakoli A; Surange RS; Pearson RC; Parrott NR; Augustine T; Riad HN
    J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2260-4; discussion 2264. PubMed ID: 17509336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epidural catheters can facilitate laparoscopic placement of ureteral stent: description of a technique.
    Wei C; Li-an S; Li Z; Guomin W
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Apr; 17(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 17450094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of a novel degradable ureteral stent in a porcine model.
    Hadaschik BA; Paterson RF; Fazli L; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Chew BH
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1161-6. PubMed ID: 18639278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized evaluation of Ureteral Stents using validated Symptom Questionnaire.
    Lee C; Kuskowski M; Premoli J; Skemp N; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2005 Oct; 19(8):990-3. PubMed ID: 16253066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resistance to extrinsic compression and maintenance of intraluminal flow in coil-reinforced stents (Silhouette Scaffold Device): an in vitro study.
    Miyaoka R; Hendlin K; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2010 Apr; 24(4):595-8. PubMed ID: 20136399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics and clinical significance of bacterial colonization of ureteral double-J stents in children.
    Ben-Meir D; Golan S; Ehrlich Y; Livne PM
    J Pediatr Urol; 2009 Oct; 5(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 19251483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining the proper stent length to use in children: age plus 10.
    Palmer JS; Palmer LS
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1566-9. PubMed ID: 17707050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.