186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16844928)
1. Imaging characteristics of malignant lesions of the male breast.
Chen L; Chantra PK; Larsen LH; Barton P; Rohitopakarn M; Zhu EQ; Bassett LW
Radiographics; 2006; 26(4):993-1006. PubMed ID: 16844928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Male breast disease: pictorial review with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Nguyen C; Kettler MD; Swirsky ME; Miller VI; Scott C; Krause R; Hadro JA
Radiographics; 2013 May; 33(3):763-79. PubMed ID: 23674773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging characteristics of male breast disease.
Adibelli ZH; Oztekin O; Gunhan-Bilgen I; Postaci H; Uslu A; Ilhan E
Breast J; 2010; 16(5):510-8. PubMed ID: 20560973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From the radiologic pathology archives: diseases of the male breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Lattin GE; Jesinger RA; Mattu R; Glassman LM
Radiographics; 2013; 33(2):461-89. PubMed ID: 23479708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image presentation. Sonographic appearances of benign and malignant male breast disease with mammographic and pathologic correlation.
Yitta S; Singer CI; Toth HB; Mercado CL
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jun; 29(6):931-47. PubMed ID: 20498468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammography Findings of Male Breast Diseases.
Şafak KY
J Breast Health; 2015 Jul; 11(3):106-110. PubMed ID: 28331703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinics in diagnostic imaging (147). Male breast carcinoma.
Tan TJ; Leong LC; Sim LS
Singapore Med J; 2013 Jun; 54(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 23820547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant male breast lesions in mammography.
Huang Y; Xiao Q; Sun Y; Li Q; Wang S; Gu Y
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109339. PubMed ID: 33080548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in Imaging Workup of the Male Breast: Experience from a Single Center.
Lawson P; Nissan N; Faermann R; Halshtok O; Shalmon A; Gotleib M; Akiva Ben David M; Sklair Levy M
Isr Med Assoc J; 2019 Oct; 21(10):666-670. PubMed ID: 31599508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A practical approach to guide clinicians in the evaluation of male patients with breast masses.
Hines SL; Tan W; Larson JM; Thompson KM; Jorn HK; Files JA
Geriatrics; 2008 Jun; 63(6):19-24. PubMed ID: 18512997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasonographic and Mammographic Findings of Male Breast Disease.
Kim SH; Kim YS
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jan; 38(1):243-252. PubMed ID: 29708282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Malignant and benign diseases of the breast in 41 male patients: mammography, sonography and pathohistological correlations].
Partik B; Mallek R; Rudas M; Pokieser P; Wunderbaldinger P; Helbich TH
Rofo; 2001 Nov; 173(11):1012-8. PubMed ID: 11704911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 201Tl scintigraphy in the evaluation of palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation with mammography and ultrasonography.
Vural G; Atasever T; Ozdemir A; Oznur I; Karabacak NI; Gökçora N; Işik S; Unlü M
Nuklearmedizin; 1997 Dec; 36(8):282-8. PubMed ID: 17068879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiologic evaluation of lumps in the male breast.
Tangerud Å; Potapenko I; Skjerven HK; Stensrud MJ
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jul; 57(7):809-14. PubMed ID: 26543053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overuse of imaging the male breast-findings in 557 patients.
Lapid O; Siebenga P; Zonderland HM
Breast J; 2015; 21(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 25772378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distinguishing breast skin lesions from superficial breast parenchymal lesions: diagnostic criteria, imaging characteristics, and pitfalls.
Giess CS; Raza S; Birdwell RL
Radiographics; 2011; 31(7):1959-72. PubMed ID: 22084181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of mammography in male patients with breast symptoms.
Hines SL; Tan WW; Yasrebi M; DePeri ER; Perez EA
Mayo Clin Proc; 2007 Mar; 82(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 17352365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
