130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16844933)
1. Evaluation of benign and malignant rectal lesions with CT colonography and endoscopic correlation.
Silva AC; Vens EA; Hara AK; Fletcher JG; Fidler JL; Johnson CD
Radiographics; 2006; 26(4):1085-99. PubMed ID: 16844933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT colonography with intravenous contrast material: varied appearances of colorectal carcinoma.
Silva AC; Hara AK; Leighton JA; Heppell JP
Radiographics; 2005; 25(5):1321-34. PubMed ID: 16160114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Malignant rectal polyp overlooked on CT colonography because of retention balloon: opposing crescent appearance as sign of compressed polyp.
Choi EK; Park SH; Kim DY; Ha HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):W1-3. PubMed ID: 17579127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach.
Mang T; Maier A; Plank C; Mueller-Mang C; Herold C; Schima W
Radiographics; 2007; 27(2):431-54. PubMed ID: 17374862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [CT colonography --"virtual colonoscopy"--a current review].
Aschoff AJ; Juchems MS; Weber CK; Brambs HJ
Z Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):1199-205. PubMed ID: 15508062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. TC Rectal Pathology: Findings at CT-Colonography.
Martínez-Sapiña Llanas MJ; Otero Muinelo SA; Crespo García C
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2018; 60(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 29169607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multislice spiral CT colonography in the evaluation of colorectal neoplasms.
Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Trenna S; Mangiapane F; Sinibaldi G; Piacentini F; Sammartino P; Stipa V; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2002; 104(5-6):394-403. PubMed ID: 12589260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-body PET/CT-colonography: a possible new concept for colorectal cancer staging.
Kinner S; Antoch G; Bockisch A; Veit-Haibach P
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(5):606-12. PubMed ID: 17387540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT colonography: contrast enhancement of benign and malignant colorectal lesions versus fecal residuals.
Neri E; Vagli P; Picchietti S; Vannozzi F; Linsalata S; Bardine A; Bartolozzi C
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(6):694-7. PubMed ID: 16252141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer.
Chung DJ; Huh KC; Choi WJ; Kim JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15615957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography.
Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Lui YW; Laks S; Milano A; Babb J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jul; 183(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 15208126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection.
Geenen RW; Hussain SM; Cademartiri F; Poley JW; Siersema PD; Krestin GP
Radiographics; 2004; 24(1):e18. PubMed ID: 14527992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Missed lesions and false-positive findings on computed-tomographic colonography: a controlled prospective analysis.
Arnesen RB; Adamsen S; Svendsen LB; Raaschou HO; von Benzon E; Hansen OH
Endoscopy; 2005 Oct; 37(10):937-44. PubMed ID: 16189765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined CT colonography and 18F-FDG PET of colon polyps: potential technique for selective detection of cancer and precancerous lesions.
Gollub MJ; Akhurst T; Markowitz AJ; Weiser MR; Guillem JG; Smith LM; Larson SM; Margulis AR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):130-8. PubMed ID: 17179355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Virtual CT colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a prospective study.
Abdel Razek AA; Abu Zeid MM; Bilal M; Abdel Wahab NM
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(66):1698-702. PubMed ID: 16334760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT colonography: techniques, indications, findings.
Mang T; Graser A; Schima W; Maier A
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Mar; 61(3):388-99. PubMed ID: 17224254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Efficacy of CT colonography versus colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer].
Martín-López JE; Carlos-Gil AM; Luque-Romero L; Flores-Moreno S
Radiologia; 2011; 53(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 21354586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [CT colonography: a new method for detecting colorectal cancer and polyps].
Ringstad G; Holmquist H; Brabrand K; Aaløkken TM; Hauge T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1470-3. PubMed ID: 16732340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
