120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16845711)
41. Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) gene expression signatures classify an independent cohort of adult ALL patients.
Kohlmann A; Schoch C; Schnittger S; Dugas M; Hiddemann W; Kern W; Haferlach T
Leukemia; 2004 Jan; 18(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 14603332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Work efficiency: a new criterion for comprehensive comparison and evaluation of statistical methods in large-scale identification of differentially expressed genes.
Tan YD
Genomics; 2011 Nov; 98(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 21741470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Acute leukemia: subtype discovery and prediction of outcome by gene expression profiling.
Downing JR
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2003; 87():66-71. PubMed ID: 16888896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Long non-coding RNAs: biomarkers for acute leukaemia subtypes.
Melo CP; Campos CB; Rodrigues Jde O; Aguirre-Neto JC; Atalla Â; Pianovski MA; Carbone EK; Lares LB; Moraes-Souza H; Octacílio-Silva S; Pais FS; Ferreira AC; Assumpção JG
Br J Haematol; 2016 Apr; 173(2):318-20. PubMed ID: 26204929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. A stable iterative method for refining discriminative gene clusters.
Xu M; Zhu M; Zhang L
BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S18. PubMed ID: 18831783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Gene expression-based classification and regulatory networks of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Li Z; Zhang W; Wu M; Zhu S; Gao C; Sun L; Zhang R; Qiao N; Xue H; Hu Y; Bao S; Zheng H; Han JD
Blood; 2009 Nov; 114(20):4486-93. PubMed ID: 19755675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Distinction of acute lymphoblastic leukemia from acute myeloid leukemia through microarray-based DNA methylation analysis.
Scholz C; Nimmrich I; Burger M; Becker E; Dörken B; Ludwig WD; Maier S
Ann Hematol; 2005 Apr; 84(4):236-44. PubMed ID: 15538567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Array comparative genomic hybridization in pediatric acute leukemias.
Laskowska J; Szczepanek J; Styczyński J; Tretyn A
Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 30(8):677-87. PubMed ID: 23758127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Direct labeling of RNA with multiple biotins allows sensitive expression profiling of acute leukemia class predictor genes.
Cole K; Truong V; Barone D; McGall G
Nucleic Acids Res; 2004; 32(11):e86. PubMed ID: 15205470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of mRNA abundance quantified by gene expression profiling and percentage of positive cells using immunophenotyping for diagnostic antigens in acute and chronic leukemias.
Kern W; Kohlmann A; Schoch C; Schnittger S; Haferlach T
Cancer; 2006 Nov; 107(10):2401-7. PubMed ID: 17041886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Novel statistical framework to identify differentially expressed genes allowing transcriptomic background differences.
Ling ZQ; Wang Y; Mukaisho K; Hattori T; Tatsuta T; Ge MH; Jin L; Mao WM; Sugihara H
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 20400756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Unimodal transform of variables selected by interval segmentation purity for classification tree modeling of high-dimensional microarray data.
Du W; Gu T; Tang LJ; Jiang JH; Wu HL; Shen GL; Yu RQ
Talanta; 2011 Sep; 85(3):1689-94. PubMed ID: 21807240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Identification of differentially expressed genes using multi-resolution wavelet transformation analysis combined with SAM.
Wu Y; Zhang L; Liu L; Zhang Y; Yi D
Gene; 2012 Nov; 509(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 22906473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Hybrid genetic algorithm-neural network: feature extraction for unpreprocessed microarray data.
Tong DL; Schierz AC
Artif Intell Med; 2011 Sep; 53(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 21775110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Genes predictive of outcome and novel molecular classification schemes in adult acute myeloid leukemia.
Verhaak RG; Valk PJ
Cancer Treat Res; 2010; 145():67-83. PubMed ID: 20306246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Identification of prognostic risk factors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia based on mRNA expression profiling.
Li C; Kuang L; Zhu B; Chen J; Wang X; Huang X
Neoplasma; 2017; 64(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 28485154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The 'miss rate' for the analysis of gene expression data.
Taylor J; Tibshirani R; Efron B
Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 15618531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
