153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16845927)
1. A comparison of Australian and Canadian calibration coefficients for air kerma and absorbed dose to water for 60Co gamma radiation.
Shortt KR; Huntley RB; Kotler LH; Boas JF; Webb DV
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Jun; 29(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16845927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shift in absorbed dose for megavoltage photons when changing to TRS-398 in Australia.
Butler DJ; Palmans H; Webb DV; ;
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 16250469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The US radiation dosimetry standards for 60Co therapy level beams, and the transfer to the AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
Minniti R; Chen-Mayer H; Seltzer SM; Huq MS; Bryson L; Slowey T; Micka JA; DeWerd LA; Wells N; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS;
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1074-7. PubMed ID: 16696484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A standard for absorbed dose rate to water in a 60Co field using a graphite calorimeter at the National Metrology Institute of Japan.
Morishita Y; Kato M; Takata N; Kurosawa T; Tanaka T; Saito N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 22951998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the NMIJ and the ARPANSA standards for absorbed dose to water in high-energy photon beams.
Shimizu M; Morishita Y; Kato M; Tanaka T; Kurosawa T; Takata N; Saito N; Ramanathan G; Harty PD; Oliver C; Wright T; Butler DJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 25209996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aeq and other factors in a 60Co beam for a spherical or cylindrical minimal phantom and for an ionization chamber with a known A(wall) correction factor.
Iwasaki A
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Jul; 39(7):1069-79. PubMed ID: 15552097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics of 60Co gamma-ray SPR (scatter-primary ratio), SF (scatter factor), beta (dose-kerma ratio), and dmax (depth of maximum dose).
Iwasaki A
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Jul; 39(7):1081-8. PubMed ID: 15552098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re-evaluation of correction factors of a primary standard graphite calorimeter in 60Co gamma ray beams as a basis for the appointment of the BEV absorbed dose rate to water reference value.
Baumgartner A; Steurer A; Tiefenböck W; Gabris F; Maringer FJ; Kapsch RP; Stucki G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Apr; 145(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 21112889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commissioning of an NRC-type sealed water calorimeter at METAS using 60Co gamma-rays.
Medin J; Ross CK; Stucki G; Klassen NV; Seuntjens JP
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):4073-86. PubMed ID: 15470924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of dosimetric standards of Canada and France for photons at 60Co and higher energies.
Shortt K; Ross C; Seuntjens J; Delaunay F; Ostrowsky A; Gross P; Leroy E
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 46(8):2119-42. PubMed ID: 11512615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 192Ir air kerma calibration coefficients derived at ARPANSA using the interpolation method and at the National Physical Laboratory using a direct measurement.
Butler D; Haworth A; Sander T; Todd S
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 31(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 19239060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct MC conversion of absorbed dose to graphite to absorbed dose to water for 60Co radiation.
Lye JE; Butler DJ; Franich RD; Harty PD; Oliver CP; Ramanathan G; Webb DV; Wright T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 23152147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microionization chamber air-kerma calibration coefficients as a function of photon energy for x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Snow JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041711. PubMed ID: 23556881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two methods of therapy level calibration at 60Co gamma beams.
Bjerke H; Järvinen H; Grimbergen TW; Grindborg JE; Chauvenet B; Czap L; Ennow K; Moretti C; Rocha P
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 43(10):2729-40. PubMed ID: 9814513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of dosimetry calibration factors at the NRCC and the NIST. National Research Council of Canada. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Shortt K; Shobe J; Domen S
Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1644-54. PubMed ID: 10947268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RE-EVALUATION OF THE AIR KERMA PRIMARY STANDARD OF THE SMU IN 60Co AND 137Cs GAMMA RAY BEAMS.
Durný N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 186(2-3):235-238. PubMed ID: 32123913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct megavoltage photon calibration service in Australia.
Butler DJ; Ramanathan G; Oliver C; Cole A; Lye J; Harty PD; Wright T; Webb DV; Followill DS
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Dec; 37(4):753-61. PubMed ID: 25146559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Development of the 60Co gamma-ray standard field for therapy-level dosimeter calibration in terms of absorbed dose to water (N(D,w))].
Fukumura A; Mizuno H; Fukahori M; Sakata S
Igaku Butsuri; 2012; 32(4):182-8. PubMed ID: 24568023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
