182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16846085)
1. Electronic residency application service scores: do they correlate with the rank order list for the match?
Argeles PC; Weiss PM; Koller CA; Kimmel S; Hess LW
J Reprod Med; 2006 Jun; 51(6):471-4. PubMed ID: 16846085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Candid candidate comments: the relationship between residency program selection factors and match list placements from ranked applicants.
Raymond MJ; Sokol RJ; Vontver LA; Ginsburg KA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 193(5):1842-7. PubMed ID: 16260246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postinterview communication with residency applicants: a call for clarity!
Frishman GN; Matteson KA; Bienstock JL; George KE; Ogburn T; Rauk PN; Schnatz PF; Learman LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 211(4):344-350.e1. PubMed ID: 25068562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Professionalism and the match: a pediatric residency program's postinterview no-call policy and its impact on applicants.
Opel D; Shugerman R; McPhillips H; Swanson WS; Archibald S; Diekema D
Pediatrics; 2007 Oct; 120(4):e826-31. PubMed ID: 17768182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The prevalence and nature of postinterview communications between residency programs and applicants during the match.
Jena AB; Arora VM; Hauer KE; Durning S; Borges N; Oriol N; Elnicki DM; Fagan MJ; Harrell HE; Torre D; Prochaska M; Meltzer DO; Reddy S
Acad Med; 2012 Oct; 87(10):1434-42. PubMed ID: 22914523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The process of resident selection: a view from the residency director's desk.
Taylor CA; Weinstein L; Mayhew HE
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 85(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 7824250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verification of publications, presentations and posters by applicants to a residency in obstetrics and gynecology.
Gussman D; Blechman A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Apr; 52(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 17506363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two methods for ranking applicants for residency.
Collins M; Curtis A; Artis K; Staib L; Bokhari J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Dec; 7(12):961-6. PubMed ID: 21129688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use and utility of Web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants.
Embi PJ; Desai S; Cooney TG
J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e22. PubMed ID: 14517113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can a structured, behavior-based interview predict future resident success?
Strand EA; Moore E; Laube DW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):446.e1-446.e13. PubMed ID: 21457921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selecting the future in obstetrics and gynaecology: are we stuck in the past?
Campbell N; Abbott J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Aug; 51(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 21806577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria.
Bernstein AD; Jazrawi LM; Elbeshbeshy B; Della Valle CJ; Zuckerman JD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2002-2003; 61(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 12828380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obstetrics and gynecology residents as teachers of medical students: predictors of excellence.
Ogburn JA; Espey EL; Dorin MH; Ming C; Rayburn WF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 193(5):1831-4. PubMed ID: 16260244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of United States medical licensing examination step 2 and obstetrics and gynecology clerkship final examination scores with clerkship clinical evaluation scores.
Myles TD
J Reprod Med; 2005 May; 50(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 15971484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of the first two years of applicants to a new emergency medicine residency program.
Madsen T; Sturges Z; Dawson M; Knapp S; Groke S; Stroud S; Hartsell S; Davis V; Bledsoe J; Barton E
J Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 41(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 21421293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Urology Match and Postinterview Communication.
Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Kaplan A; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():44-51. PubMed ID: 29935262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship Between Postinterview Correspondence From Residency Program Applicants and Subsequent Applicant Match Outcomes.
Swan EC; Baudendistel TE
J Grad Med Educ; 2014 Sep; 6(3):478-83. PubMed ID: 26279772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of the interview in admissions at the University of Toronto ophthalmology program.
Christakis PG; Christakis TJ; Dziura J; Christakis JT
Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 45(5):527-30. PubMed ID: 20847756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
