107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16846184)
1. The limits and power of peer review.
Hammerschmidt DE; Franklin M
Minn Med; 2006 Jun; 89(6):43-5. PubMed ID: 16846184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 'Bad Science' and publication ethics.
Robinson JJ
Int Nurs Rev; 2009 Sep; 56(3):276. PubMed ID: 19702795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. So what is a sham peer review?
Chalifoux R
MedGenMed; 2005 Nov; 7(4):47; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 16614669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Retraction of articles with misleading information.
Gibbs NM
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2011 May; 39(3):344. PubMed ID: 21736182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Journal of Traumatic Stress Ethics Policy.
Kerig PK
J Trauma Stress; 2019 Feb; 32(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 30702772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Media mania, megalomania and misleading research: the need for caution in scientific publication.
Higgins A
Vet J; 2003 Nov; 166(3):213-4. PubMed ID: 14550726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Do we need a neurosurgical Interpol?
Sbeih I
Surg Neurol; 2009 Dec; 72(6):628-9. PubMed ID: 19818479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review pitfalls.
Chaguturu R
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2015; 18(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 25692538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [This is not our medical ethic].
Harboe M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Sep; 126(17):2283. PubMed ID: 16967071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lessons in empowerment: honesty is essential for trust.
Scanes CG
Poult Sci; 2010 May; 89(5):859. PubMed ID: 20371834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Once again about certain ethical principles of science and research].
Tsimmerman IaS
Klin Med (Mosk); 2009; 87(2):4-7. PubMed ID: 19348291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Control of research ethics standards by the scientific community is not sufficient].
Persson A
Lakartidningen; 2007 Aug 8-21; 104(32-33):2244-7. PubMed ID: 17822203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptions of scientific misconduct among graduate allied health students relative to ethics education and gender.
Mundt LA
J Allied Health; 2008; 37(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 19157051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?".
Gluckmann ET
MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):83; author reply 82. PubMed ID: 16955549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?".
Kramer SN
MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):83; author reply 82. PubMed ID: 16955548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?".
Blumsohn A
MedGenMed; 2006 Mar; 8(1):83; author reply 82. PubMed ID: 16915213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Do the right thing.
Olshansky E
J Prof Nurs; 2007; 23(4):185-6. PubMed ID: 17675112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".
Huntoon LR
MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):34; author reply 33. PubMed ID: 16967526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
