357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16846282)
1. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of color word availability on the Stroop color-naming effect.
Kim H; Cho YS; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1540-51. PubMed ID: 19064496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stroop dilution revisited: evidence for domain-specific, limited-capacity processing.
Roberts MA; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 15709859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response variations to Stroop color-word stimuli.
Izawa C; Silver NC
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1988 May; 114(2):211-55. PubMed ID: 3402729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Stroop effect for spatial orientation.
Wühr P
J Gen Psychol; 2007 Jul; 134(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 17824399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components.
McKenna FP; Sharma D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):382-92. PubMed ID: 14979812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Color- and picture-word Stroop tests: performance changes in old age.
Graf P; Uttl B; Tuokko H
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 May; 17(3):390-415. PubMed ID: 7650102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte).
Beran MJ; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 17503696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transitions between color categories mapped with a reverse Stroop task.
Smithson HE; Khan SS; Sharpe LT; Stockman A
Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16961980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
Roelofs A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Deficit in selective attention and its evolution in depression].
Thomas J; Raoux N; Everett J; Dantchev N; Widlöcher D
Encephale; 1997; 23(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 9264929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attention and attentional shift efficiency in individuals with and without mental retardation.
Bergen AM; Mosley JL
Am J Ment Retard; 1994 May; 98(6):732-43. PubMed ID: 8054202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
