These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16846282)

  • 21. Attentional selection and word processing in Stroop and word search tasks: the role of selection for action.
    Brown TL
    Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 8644887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
    Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual differences in Stroop dilution: tests of the attention-capture hypothesis.
    Yee PL; Hunt E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):715-25. PubMed ID: 1834786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Experimental evidence for interpretive but not attention biases towards somatic information in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.
    Moss-Morris R; Petrie KJ
    Br J Health Psychol; 2003 May; 8(Pt 2):195-208. PubMed ID: 12804333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of Stroop interference on categorical perception in simultaneous color discrimination.
    Suegami T; Michimata C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Jun; 110(3 Pt 1):857-78. PubMed ID: 20681338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anxiety-related Stroop interference in adolescents.
    Richards A; Richards LC; McGeeney A
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Jul; 127(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 10975428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reverse stroop effects with untranslated responses.
    Blais C; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1345-53. PubMed ID: 17154776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
    Schmidt JR; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 18444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: a comparative fMRI study on selective attention.
    Melcher T; Gruber O
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 17022954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reduced Stroop interference for opponent colors may be due to input factors: evidence from individual differences and a neural network simulation.
    Laeng B; Låg T; Brennen T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):438-52. PubMed ID: 15982124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return.
    Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):935-44. PubMed ID: 19679871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):95-136. PubMed ID: 11216323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy.
    Horstmann G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1039-60. PubMed ID: 16262497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects.
    Tsal Y; Benoni H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1645-56. PubMed ID: 20822300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: automaticity revealed.
    Marmurek HH
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 12773021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Examining the time course of prime effects on Stroop processing.
    Koch C; Brown JM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 2):675-87. PubMed ID: 7808909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of procedural variations on lateralized Stroop effects.
    Weekes NY; Zaidel E
    Brain Cogn; 1996 Aug; 31(3):308-30. PubMed ID: 8812012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of attentional slippage in Stroop dilution.
    Park BY; Cho YS
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Nov; 86():103047. PubMed ID: 33220652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.