479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16846560)
1. [Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage].
Gallo J; Rozkydal Z; Sklenský M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Jun; 73(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16846560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
García-Rey E; Madero R; García-Cimbrelo E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement].
Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the Burch-Schneider cage and structural allografts in complex acetabular deficiency: 3- to 10-year follow up.
Hsu CC; Hsu CH; Yen SH; Wang JW
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Oct; 31(10):540-7. PubMed ID: 26520694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Hip joint arthroplasty following surgical treatment of acetabular fracture].
Pavelka T; Linhart M; Houcek P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 17026886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
Yoshino K; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Lee TH; Nakamura J; Suzuki M; Ohtori S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The midterm and long-term effects of acetabular roof ring and Burch-Schneider anti-protusio cages in acetabular revisions for patients with acetabular bone deficiency.
Demir MT; Pirinççi Y; Salih M; Erdoğan F; Güney N
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 26511685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.
Lachiewicz PF; O'Dell JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29529665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
Krbec M; Adler J; Messner P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up.
Jones L; Grammatopoulos G; Singer G
Hip Int; 2012; 22(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 22383324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Acetabulum reinforcement ring with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision].
Liu W; Yang J; Pei F; Shen B; Zhou Z; Kang P
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 26(8):902-4. PubMed ID: 23012918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note.
Bal BS; Maurer T; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1703-6. PubMed ID: 10608381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring With a Hook: A Precise Follow-Up, at Average 11.4 Years, of a Previous Report.
Park KS; Seon JK; Lee KB; Kim SK; Chan CK; Yoon TR
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):503-509. PubMed ID: 27546473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
Götze C; Sippel C; Wendt G; Steinbeck J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reconstruction of the acetabulum during replacement of the aseptically loosened polyethylene cup].
Koudela K; Malotín T
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 11706538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.
Whaley AL; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 83(9):1352-7. PubMed ID: 11568198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
