289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16846869)
1. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population.
Malomo OO; Kuti O; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO; Sule SS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jul; 26(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 16846869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity].
Huchon C; Raiffort C; Chis C; Messaoudi F; Jacquemot MC; Panel P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Oct; 33(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 16154376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean section.
van Bogaert LJ; Misra A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 29(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 19358028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section.
Galaal KA; Krolikowski A
Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):759-61. PubMed ID: 11423890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
Komoto Y; Shimoya K; Shimizu T; Kimura T; Hayashi S; Temma-Asano K; Kanagawa T; Fukuda H; Murata Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study.
Weerawetwat W; Buranawanich S; Kanawong M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87(9):1007-11. PubMed ID: 15515998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section--evaluation of pain. A randomized study.
Højberg KE; Aagaard J; Laursen H; Diab L; Secher NJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Aug; 77(7):741-5. PubMed ID: 9740522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
Zareian Z; Zareian P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery.
Hull DB; Varner MW
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):818-21. PubMed ID: 2030849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a prospective randomized study.
Anteby EY; Kruchkovich J; Kapustian V; Gdalevich M; Shenhav S; Gemer O
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1026-30. PubMed ID: 20144167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Peritoneal suture vs. non-suture at caesarean section].
Mocanaşu C; Anton E; Chirilă R
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2005; 109(4):810-2. PubMed ID: 16610179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Closure or non closure of the peritoneum at cesarean section in 2008?].
Doret M; Gaucherand P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Sep; 37(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 18495379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re: Malomo OO, Kuti O, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Sule SS. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006;26:429-432.
Armstrong C; Power T
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 27(2):232. PubMed ID: 17454497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery.
Nagele F; Karas H; Spitzer D; Staudach A; Karasegh S; Beck A; Husslein P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Apr; 174(4):1366-70. PubMed ID: 8623871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Towards a simplification of caesarean section technique: non-closure of peritoneum?].
Malek-Mellouli M; Ibrahima S; Ben Amara F; Néji K; Bouchneck M; Youssef A; Nasr M; Zouari B; Reziga H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2011 Oct; 40(6):541-8. PubMed ID: 21764225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Results from repeat cesarean sections].
Nather A; Zeisler H; Sam CE; Husslein P; Joura EA
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Jun; 113(11-12):451-3. PubMed ID: 11467092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised controlled trial of uterine exteriorisation and non-exteriorisation at caesarean section.
Orji EO; Olaleye AO; Loto OM; Ogunniyi SO
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Dec; 48(6):570-4. PubMed ID: 19133045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.
Kapustian V; Anteby EY; Gdalevich M; Shenhav S; Lavie O; Gemer O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 206(1):56.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21924397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parietal peritoneal closure versus non-closure at caesarean section: which technique is feasible to perform?
Altinbas SK; Cenksoy P; Tapisiz OL; Beydilli G; Yirci B; Ercan Ö; Dede S; Kandemir O
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jul; 26(11):1128-31. PubMed ID: 23350686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions.
Lyell DJ; Caughey AB; Hu E; Daniels K
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 106(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 16055575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
