193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16846918)
1. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games.
Van den Bergh B; Dewitte S
Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Aug; 273(1597):2091-5. PubMed ID: 16846918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between platelet serotonin content and rejections of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
Emanuele E; Brondino N; Bertona M; Re S; Geroldi D
Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 437(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 18448251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Serum omega-3 fatty acids are associated with ultimatum bargaining behavior.
Emanuele E; Brondino N; Re S; Bertona M; Geroldi D
Physiol Behav; 2009 Jan; 96(1):180-3. PubMed ID: 18940191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are patients with schizophrenia rational maximizers? Evidence from an ultimatum game study.
Csukly G; Polgár P; Tombor L; Réthelyi J; Kéri S
Psychiatry Res; 2011 May; 187(1-2):11-7. PubMed ID: 21035194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the Ultimatum Game.
Koenigs M; Tranel D
J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(4):951-6. PubMed ID: 17251437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empathy leads to fairness.
Page KM; Nowak MA
Bull Math Biol; 2002 Nov; 64(6):1101-16. PubMed ID: 12508533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why do people reject unintended inequity? Responders' rejection in a truncated ultimatum game.
Ohmura Y; Yamagishi T
Psychol Rep; 2005 Apr; 96(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 15941131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rational maximizing by humans (Homo sapiens) in an ultimatum game.
Smith P; Silberberg A
Anim Cogn; 2010 Jul; 13(4):671-7. PubMed ID: 20130945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
Ma Q; Hu Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
Sanfey AG; Rilling JK; Aronson JA; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1755-8. PubMed ID: 12805551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The price of racial bias: intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game.
Kubota JT; Li J; Bar-David E; Banaji MR; Phelps EA
Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2498-504. PubMed ID: 24121413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The spatial ultimatum game.
Page KM; Nowak MA; Sigmund K
Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Nov; 267(1458):2177-82. PubMed ID: 11413630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of facial attractiveness and alleged personality traits on fairness decisions in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERPs.
Li T; Liang Z; Yuan Y; Sommer W; Li W
Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108809. PubMed ID: 38718883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game.
Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Zheng Y; Guo X; Yang G
Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():126-134. PubMed ID: 28223239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions.
Moretti L; di Pellegrino G
Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 20364893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The presence of aggression cues inverts the relation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and prosocial behaviour in a dictator game.
Millet K; Dewitte S
Br J Psychol; 2009 Feb; 100(Pt 1):151-62. PubMed ID: 18590604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
