193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16846918)
21. Pro-inflammatory cytokine predicts reduced rejection of unfair financial offers.
Ohira H; Osumi T; Matsunaga M; Yamakawa K
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2013; 34(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23524623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Random allocation of pies promotes the evolution of fairness in the Ultimatum Game.
Wang X; Chen X; Wang L
Sci Rep; 2014 Apr; 4():4534. PubMed ID: 24686840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The role of cognitive and emotional perspective taking in economic decision making in the ultimatum game.
Takagishi H; Koizumi M; Fujii T; Schug J; Kameshima S; Yamagishi T
PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108462. PubMed ID: 25255309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lower dorsal striatum activation in association with neuroticism during the acceptance of unfair offers.
Servaas MN; Aleman A; Marsman JB; Renken RJ; Riese H; Ormel J
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 25720857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Examination of social decision making in patients with schizophrenia using ultimatum game.
Patil VA; Jacob AA; Chacko DM; Chakrabarti D; Devi P; Thonse U; Kumar V; Varambally S; Venkatasubramanian G; Rao NP
Asian J Psychiatr; 2020 Apr; 50():101937. PubMed ID: 32109802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.
Nowak MA; Page KM; Sigmund K
Science; 2000 Sep; 289(5485):1773-5. PubMed ID: 10976075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Proposer's moral identity modulates fairness processing in the ultimatum game: Evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
Fan C; Wang H; Liu D; Sun J; Han F; He W
Int J Psychophysiol; 2024 Jul; 201():112360. PubMed ID: 38735630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Reciprocity and identity protection: reasons for rejection in the ultimatum game].
Horita Y; Yamagishi T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Oct; 78(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 18027592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.
Bechler C; Green L; Myerson J
Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():149-55. PubMed ID: 25862989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impaired social cognition in schizophrenia during the Ultimatum Game: An EEG study.
Horat SK; Favre G; Prévot A; Ventura J; Herrmann FR; Gothuey I; Merlo MCG; Missonnier P
Schizophr Res; 2018 Feb; 192():308-316. PubMed ID: 28578921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sociosexual orientation and 2D:4D ratios in women: Relationship to men's desirability ratings as a long-term pair bond.
DeLecce TL; Polheber JP; Matchock RL
Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Feb; 43(2):319-27. PubMed ID: 24356948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mentalizing in economic decision-making.
Polezzi D; Daum I; Rubaltelli E; Lotto L; Civai C; Sartori G; Rumiati R
Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 190(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 18406476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Information, Strategic Behavior, and Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining: An Experimental Study.
Güth W; van Damme E
J Math Psychol; 1998 Jun; 42(2/3):227-47. PubMed ID: 9710549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sensitivity to fairness and intentions of others in the ultimatum game in patients with ventromedial prefontal lesions.
Shamay-Tsoory SG; Suleiman R; Aharon-Peretz J; Gohary R; Hirschberger G
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2012 Nov; 18(6):952-61. PubMed ID: 23158227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Local competition sparks concerns for fairness in the ultimatum game.
Barclay P; Stoller B
Biol Lett; 2014 May; 10(5):20140213. PubMed ID: 24850897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Shall I Show My Emotions? The Effects of Facial Expressions in the Ultimatum Game.
Ferracci S; Giuliani F; Brancucci A; Pietroni D
Behav Sci (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35049619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior.
Espín AM; Exadaktylos F; Herrmann B; Brañas-Garza P
Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():214. PubMed ID: 26347625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cardiac responses predict decisions: an investigation of the relation between orienting response and decisions in the ultimatum game.
Osumi T; Ohira H
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 19646490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
