245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16847586)
1. Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength.
Manske SL; Liu-Ambrose T; de Bakker PM; Liu D; Kontulainen S; Guy P; Oxland TR; McKay HA
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Oct; 17(10):1539-45. PubMed ID: 16847586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.
Szulc P; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Dargent-Molina P; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Feb; 17(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 15983728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.
Cheng XG; Lowet G; Boonen S; Nicholson PH; Brys P; Nijs J; Dequeker J
Bone; 1997 Mar; 20(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 9071471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical and trabecular bone in the femoral neck both contribute to proximal femur failure load prediction.
Manske SL; Liu-Ambrose T; Cooper DM; Kontulainen S; Guy P; Forster BB; McKay HA
Osteoporos Int; 2009 Mar; 20(3):445-53. PubMed ID: 18661091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In situ femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry related to ash weight, bone size and density, and its relationship with mechanical failure loads of the proximal femur.
Lochmüller EM; Miller P; Bürklein D; Wehr U; Rambeck W; Eckstein F
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 10928227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.
Bousson V; Le Bras A; Roqueplan F; Kang Y; Mitton D; Kolta S; Bergot C; Skalli W; Vicaut E; Kalender W; Engelke K; Laredo JD
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 16547689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of femoral neck strength by 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry.
Le Bras A; Kolta S; Soubrane P; Skalli W; Roux C; Mitton D
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 17097528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current and past menstrual status is an important determinant of femoral neck geometry in exercising women.
Mallinson RJ; Williams NI; Gibbs JC; Koehler K; Allaway HCM; Southmayd E; De Souza MJ
Bone; 2016 Jul; 88():101-112. PubMed ID: 27129885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women and men with hip fractures have a longer femoral neck moment arm and greater impact load in a sideways fall.
Wang Q; Teo JW; Ghasem-Zadeh A; Seeman E
Osteoporos Int; 2009 Jul; 20(7):1151-6. PubMed ID: 18931818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osteoporosis and anterior femoral notching in periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis.
Shawen SB; Belmont PJ; Klemme WR; Topoleski LD; Xenos JS; Orchowski JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jan; 85(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 12533581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DXA predictions of human femoral mechanical properties depend on the load configuration.
Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Pretterklieber M; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Nov; 35(11):1564-72; discussion 1564. PubMed ID: 23684578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contribution of trochanteric soft tissues to fall force estimates, the factor of risk, and prediction of hip fracture risk.
Bouxsein ML; Szulc P; Munoz F; Thrall E; Sornay-Rendu E; Delmas PD
J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Jun; 22(6):825-31. PubMed ID: 17352651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.
Johannesdottir F; Thrall E; Muller J; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl DL; Bouxsein ML
Bone; 2017 Dec; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 28739416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of DXA and MRI methods for interpreting femoral neck bone mineral density.
Arokoski MH; Arokoski JP; Vainio P; Niemitukia LH; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS
J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 12357066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of anteversion on femoral bone mineral density and geometry measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cadaver study.
Cheng XG; Nicholson PH; Boonen S; Brys P; Lowet G; Nijs J; Dequeker J
Bone; 1997 Jul; 21(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 9213017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The contribution of cortical and cancellous bone to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in the female proximal femur.
Lundeen GA; Knecht SL; Vajda EG; Bloebaum RD; Hofmann AA
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 11315237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New QCT analysis approach shows the importance of fall orientation on femoral neck strength.
Carpenter RD; Beaupré GS; Lang TF; Orwoll ES; Carter DR;
J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1533-42. PubMed ID: 16059625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduction in proximal femoral strength in patients with acute spinal cord injury.
Edwards WB; Schnitzer TJ; Troy KL
J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Sep; 29(9):2074-9. PubMed ID: 24677293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship of sarcopenia with bone geometry and mass among postmenopausal women.
França CF; Miranda C; Martins FM; Pelet DCS; de Souza Lino AD; Souza MVC; Orsatti FL
Menopause; 2023 Jan; 30(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 36576443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
