245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16847586)
21. Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.
Pisharody S; Phillips R; Langton CM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Apr; 222(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 18491705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differences in structural geometrical outcomes at the neck of the proximal femur using two-dimensional DXA-derived projection (APEX) and three-dimensional QCT-derived (BIT QCT) techniques.
Khoo BC; Brown K; Zhu K; Pollock M; Wilson KE; Price RI; Prince RL
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1393-8. PubMed ID: 21786006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The combination of structural parameters and areal bone mineral density improves relation to proximal femur strength: an in vitro study with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
Hansen S; Jensen JE; Ahrberg F; Hauge EM; Brixen K
Calcif Tissue Int; 2011 Oct; 89(4):335-46. PubMed ID: 21874544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Factors associated with proximal femur fracture determined in a large cadaveric cohort.
Dragomir-Daescu D; Rossman TL; Rezaei A; Carlson KD; Kallmes DF; Skinner JA; Khosla S; Amin S
Bone; 2018 Nov; 116():196-202. PubMed ID: 30096469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bone texture analysis of human femurs using a new device (BMA™) improves failure load prediction.
Kolta S; Paratte S; Amphoux T; Persohn S; Campana S; Skalli W; Paternotte S; Argenson JN; Bouler JM; Gagey O; Roux C
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1311-6. PubMed ID: 21656265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prediction of femoral fracture load: cross-sectional study of texture analysis and geometric measurements on plain radiographs versus bone mineral density.
Chappard C; Bousson V; Bergot C; Mitton D; Marchadier A; Moser T; Benhamou CL; Laredo JD
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):536-43. PubMed ID: 20332378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microstructural failure mechanisms in the human proximal femur for sideways fall loading.
Nawathe S; Akhlaghpour H; Bouxsein ML; Keaveny TM
J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Feb; 29(2):507-15. PubMed ID: 23832419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in predicting mechanical characteristics of rat femur.
Järvinen TL; Sievänen H; Kannus P; Järvinen M
Bone; 1998 May; 22(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 9600791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increased bone mineral content and bone size in the femoral neck of men with hip osteoarthritis.
Arokoski JP; Arokoski MH; Jurvelin JS; Helminen HJ; Niemitukia LH; Kröger H
Ann Rheum Dis; 2002 Feb; 61(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 11796401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fuzzy logic structure analysis of trabecular bone of the calcaneus to estimate proximal femur fracture load and discriminate subjects with and without vertebral fractures using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T.
Patel PV; Eckstein F; Carballido-Gamio J; Phan C; Matsuura M; Lochmüller EM; Majumdar S; Link TM
Calcif Tissue Int; 2007 Oct; 81(4):294-304. PubMed ID: 17705050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry.
Pulkkinen P; Jämsä T; Lochmüller EM; Kuhn V; Nieminen MT; Eckstein F
Osteoporos Int; 2008 Apr; 19(4):547-58. PubMed ID: 17891327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The association between hip bone marrow lesions and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional and longitudinal population-based study.
Ahedi H; Aitken D; Blizzard L; Cicuttini F; Jones G
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Oct; 21(10):1545-9. PubMed ID: 23791872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correlation of femoral and lumbar DXA and calcaneal ultrasound, measured in situ with intact soft tissues, with the in vitro failure loads of the proximal femur.
Lochmüller EM; Zeller JB; Kaiser D; Eckstein F; Landgraf J; Putz R; Steldinger R
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 10326066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Application of magnetic resonance imaging to evaluation of femoral neck structure in growing girls.
McKay HA; Sievänen H; Petit MA; MacKelvie KJ; Forkheim KM; Whittall KP; Forster BB; Macdonald H
J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 15181260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength.
Lang TF; Keyak JH; Heitz MW; Augat P; Lu Y; Mathur A; Genant HK
Bone; 1997 Jul; 21(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 9213015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of the fracture load of whole proximal femur specimens by topological analysis of the mineral distribution in DXA-scan images.
Boehm HF; Horng A; Notohamiprodjo M; Eckstein F; Burklein D; Panteleon A; Lutz J; Reiser M
Bone; 2008 Nov; 43(5):826-31. PubMed ID: 18723137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radial bending breaking resistance derived by densitometric evaluation predicts femoral neck fracture.
Gatti D; Sartori E; Braga V; Corallo F; Rossini M; Adami S
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(10):864-9. PubMed ID: 11716190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of hip fracture risk prediction by femoral aBMD to experimentally measured factor of risk.
Roberts BJ; Thrall E; Muller JA; Bouxsein ML
Bone; 2010 Mar; 46(3):742-6. PubMed ID: 19854307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. DXA and pQCT predict pertrochanteric and not femoral neck fracture load in a human side-impact fracture model.
Gebauer M; Stark O; Vettorazzi E; Grifka J; Püschel K; Amling M; Beckmann J
J Orthop Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 24019186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
