These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16847675)

  • 1. The Wingate anaerobic test's past and future and the compatibility of mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle-ergometers.
    Dotan R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Sep; 98(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 16847675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: performance and energy cost of the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Micklewright D; Alkhatib A; Beneke R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Apr; 96(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 16468058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanically braked elliptical Wingate test: modification considerations, load optimization, and reliability.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Yildiztepe E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 21904246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different calculation methods of flywheel parameters on the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Coleman SG; Hale T
    Can J Appl Physiol; 1998 Aug; 23(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 9677437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An MR-compatible bicycle ergometer for in-magnet whole-body human exercise testing.
    Jeneson JA; Schmitz JP; Hilbers PA; Nicolay K
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Jan; 63(1):257-61. PubMed ID: 19918886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate assessment of work done and power during a Wingate anaerobic test.
    Franklin KL; Gordon RS; Baker JS; Davies B
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2007 Apr; 32(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 17486163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between anaerobic components of the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit and 30-second Wingate test.
    Bertuzzi R; Kiss MA; Damasceno M; Oliveira RS; Lima-Silva AE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2015 Mar; 48(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 25627804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic calibration of mechanically, air- and electromagnetically braked cycle ergometers.
    Maxwell BF; Withers RT; Ilsley AH; Wakim MJ; Woods GF; Day L
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1998 Sep; 78(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 9754975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Muscle fibre conduction velocity during a 30-s Wingate anaerobic test.
    Stewart D; Farina D; Shen C; Macaluso A
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2011 Jun; 21(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 21419647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of testing sequence on a child's ability to achieve maximal anaerobic and aerobic power.
    Andreacci JL; Haile L; Dixon C
    Int J Sports Med; 2007 Aug; 28(8):673-7. PubMed ID: 17436194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An elliptical trainer may render the Wingate all-out test more anaerobic.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Delextrat A
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Mar; 28(3):643-50. PubMed ID: 23924890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wingate Anaerobic Test peak power and anaerobic capacity classifications for men and women intercollegiate athletes.
    Zupan MF; Arata AW; Dawson LH; Wile AL; Payn TL; Hannon ME
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Dec; 23(9):2598-604. PubMed ID: 19910814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple calibration method for mechanically braked cycle ergometers.
    Van Praagh E; Bedu M; Roddier P; Coudert J
    Int J Sports Med; 1992 Jan; 13(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 1544728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reliability of an aerobic and an anaerobic exercise tolerance test in patients with juvenile onset dermatomyositis.
    Takken T; van der Net J; Helders PJ
    J Rheumatol; 2005 Apr; 32(4):734-9. PubMed ID: 15801033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two anaerobic test measurement systems using an upper body Wingate test.
    Talbot C; Kay TD; Walker N; Price MJ
    Res Sports Med; 2014; 22(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 24950114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparison of physiological responses from cycling on friction-braked and electromagnetic ergometers.
    Seifert JG
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1991 Mar; 62(1):115-7. PubMed ID: 2028087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of the single-trial line drill test of anaerobic power in basketball players.
    Fatouros IG; Laparidis K; Kambas A; Chatzinikolaou A; Techlikidou E; Katrabasas I; Douroudos I; Leontsini D; Berberidou F; Draganidis D; Christoforidis C; Tsoukas D; Kelis S; Taxildaris K
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2011 Mar; 51(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 21297561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of anaerobic power values from an abbreviated WAnT protocol.
    Stickley CD; Hetzler RK; Kimura IF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 May; 22(3):958-65. PubMed ID: 18438215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two anaerobic water polo-specific tests with the Wingate test.
    Bampouras TM; Marrin K
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):336-40. PubMed ID: 19077741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's and adolescents' anaerobic performance during cycle ergometry.
    Williams CA
    Sports Med; 1997 Oct; 24(4):227-40. PubMed ID: 9339492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.