These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16847729)
1. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education. Guilera G; Gómez J Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education. De Champlain AF Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling. Skaggs G; Wolfe EW J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 20693702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model. Wolfe EW J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practical considerations in equating progress tests. Langer MM; Swanson DB Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):509-12. PubMed ID: 20515383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based practice for equating health status items: sample size and IRT model. Cook KF; Taylor PW; Dodd BG; Teal CR; McHorney CA J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 17440260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating. Smith RM; Gross LJ J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Item response theory and the measurement of motor behavior. Safrit MJ; Cohen AS; Costa MG Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Dec; 60(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 2489859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Test equating in the presence of DIF items. Chu KL; Kamata A J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):342-54. PubMed ID: 15942075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applying the item response theory to classroom examinations. Lawson DM J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jun; 29(5):393-7. PubMed ID: 16762668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA. Gebhardt E; Adams RJ J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17804896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and evaluation of an oral health literacy instrument for adults. Sabbahi DA; Lawrence HP; Limeback H; Rootman I Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 37(5):451-62. PubMed ID: 19740249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining item difficulty and response time on perceptual ability test items. Yang CL; O'Neill TR; Kramer GA J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(3):282-99. PubMed ID: 12147914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Equating of multi-facet tests across administrations. Lunz M; Suanthong S J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 22089509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37. Bandaranayake RC Med Teach; 2008; 30(9-10):836-45. PubMed ID: 19117221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Downing SM Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing examinations that use equal raw scores for cut scores. Swanlund A; Smith E J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(4):432-42. PubMed ID: 21164230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Convergence between cluster analysis and the Angoff method for setting minimum passing scores on credentialing examinations. Hess B; Subhiyah RG; Giordano C Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):362-75. PubMed ID: 17986670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longitudinal stability of IRT and equivalent-groups linear and equipercentile equating. Zhang X; McDermott PA; Fantuzzo JW; Gadsden VL Psychol Rep; 2013 Aug; 113(1):1303-25. PubMed ID: 24340818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items. Gierl MJ; Lai H; Turner SR Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 46(8):757-65. PubMed ID: 22803753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]