215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16848139)
1. Contact allergy and sociodemographic characteristics.
Marinović-Kulisić S; Lipozencić J; Pastar Z
Coll Antropol; 2006 Jun; 30(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 16848139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Epicutaneous patch test results in children and adults with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county: a retrospective survey.
Kuljanac I; Knežević E; Cvitanović H
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2011; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 21703155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study on Chinese common allergens of contact dermatitis.
Fan WX; Zhao B
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1990; 38(5):158-61. PubMed ID: 2286161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epidemiological survey of contact dermatitis in Italy (1984-1993) by GIRDCA (Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali).
Sertoli A; Francalanci S; Acciai MC; Gola M
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Mar; 10(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 10072334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective survey of patch testing at department of dermatology and venerology, zagreb university hospital center in zagreb, croatia.
Marinović-Kulisić S; Lipozencić J; Ljubojević S; Milavec-Puretić V
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2004; 12(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 15588559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000.
Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contact dermatitis of the hands: cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 1994-2004.
Warshaw EM; Ahmed RL; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Toby Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug KA;
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Aug; 57(2):301-14. PubMed ID: 17553593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Epicutaneous testing with a standard series. Results in 12,026 patients].
Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J; Burg G; Braun-Falco O
Hautarzt; 1988 Dec; 39(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 2976753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First epidemiological study of contact dermatitis in Spain - 1977. Spanish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Camarasa JM
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1979; 59(85):33-7. PubMed ID: 160734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Result of standard patch test in patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis.
Wongpiyabovorn J; Puvabanditsin P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88 Suppl 4():S177-83. PubMed ID: 16623025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Epicutaneous patch test results in patients with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county--a retrospective survey.
Kuljanac I; Knezević E; Cvitanović H
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2006; 14(3):156-9. PubMed ID: 17010264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey.
Akyol A; Boyvat A; Peksari Y; Gürgey E
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):333-7. PubMed ID: 15932585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency of contact allergy in German children and adolescents patch tested between 1995 and 2002: results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Heine G; Schnuch A; Uter W; Worm M
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 15479199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Periocular dermatitis: a report of 401 patients.
Temesvári E; Pónyai G; Németh I; Hidvégi B; Sas A; Kárpáti S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 18761544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch test reactions to metal salts in patients with different types of dermatitis.
Turčić P; Marinović Kulišić S; Lipozenčić J
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2013; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 24183222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standard patch test results in patients with contact dermatitis in Israel: age and sex differences.
Freireich-Astman M; David M; Trattner A
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 17244079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anogenital dermatitis in patients referred for patch testing: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2004.
Warshaw EM; Furda LM; Maibach HI; Rietschel RL; Fowler JF; Belsito DV; Zug KA; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jun; 144(6):749-55. PubMed ID: 18559763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
