215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16848139)
21. [Contact eczema and epicutaneous tests--distribution of allergens and changes in the spectrum in Vienna].
Aberer W; Reiter E
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1991; 103(9):263-7. PubMed ID: 2068817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sensitizations to allergens of TRUE test in 864 consecutive eczema patients in Israel.
Magen E; Mishal J; Schlesinger M
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):370-1. PubMed ID: 17101019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contact and aeroallergens in adulthood atopic dermatitis.
Pónyai G; Hidvégi B; Németh I; Sas A; Temesvári E; Kárpáti S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2008 Nov; 22(11):1346-55. PubMed ID: 18680530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A review of 241 subjects who were patch tested twice: could fragrance mix I cause active sensitization?
White JM; McFadden JP; White IR
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Mar; 158(3):518-21. PubMed ID: 18205877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Allergic contact dermatitis in Trieste from 1987 to 1991.
Scarpa C; Kokelj F; Stinco G; Lavaroni G
Allerg Immunol (Paris); 1992 Dec; 24(10):390-2. PubMed ID: 1288545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.
Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W;
Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Periorbital dermatitis--a recalcitrant disease: causes and differential diagnoses.
Feser A; Plaza T; Vogelgsang L; Mahler V
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 159(4):858-63. PubMed ID: 18721191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Characteristics of patients with hand dermatitis referred to the contact dermatitis unit of a tertiary hospital and impact of patch testing on diagnosis].
Carrascosa JM; Benvenuti F; Rodríguez C; Ferrándiz C
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2009; 100(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 19709554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Positive patch test reactions to nickel sulphate are not modified by neighbouring negative fragrance patch tests. A multicenter-study by the German contact dermatitis research group.
Brasch J; Weichenthal M; Szliska C; Löffler H; Koch P; Grabbe J; Mahler V; Kreilgård B; Hoeck U;
Acta Derm Venereol; 2006; 86(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 16874422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Occupational relevance of positive standard patch-test results in employed persons with an initial report of an occupational skin disease.
Dickel H; Kuss O; Schmidt A; Diepgen TL
Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2002 Aug; 75(6):423-34. PubMed ID: 12070639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Which children should we patch test?
Beattie PE; Green C; Lowe G; Lewis-Jones MS
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2007 Jan; 32(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17004990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prevalence of contact allergens in a Hispanic population.
Collazo MH; Figueroa LD; Sánchez JL
P R Health Sci J; 2008 Dec; 27(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 19069359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
Ale SI; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contact sensitivity in patients with leg ulcerations: a North American study.
Saap L; Fahim S; Arsenault E; Pratt M; Pierscianowski T; Falanga V; Pedvis-Leftick A
Arch Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 140(10):1241-6. PubMed ID: 15492187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period.
Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Ottoy W; Drieghe J; Goossens A
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 18279150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Contact sensitization in leg ulcers].
Le Coz CJ; Scrivener Y; Santinelli F; Heid E
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1998 Oct; 125(10):694-9. PubMed ID: 9835958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contact sensitivity in patients with psoriasis in Vojvodina.
Jovanović M; Boza P; Karadaglić D; Brkić S; Petrović A; Mimica-Dukić N; Anackov G; Poljacki M
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2009; 148(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 19001791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Allergic contact dermatitis in hairdressers: frequency and source of sensitisation.
Iorizzo M; Parente G; Vincenzi C; Pazzaglia M; Tosti A
Eur J Dermatol; 2002; 12(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 11872418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
