BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16848841)

  • 21. From information processing to behavioral intentions: exploring cancer patients' motivations for clinical trial enrollment.
    Janet Yang Z; McComas K; Gay G; Leonard JP; Dannenberg AJ; Dillon H
    Patient Educ Couns; 2010 May; 79(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 19748204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using web-based screening to enhance efficiency of HMO clinical trial recruitment in women aged forty and older.
    Smith KS; Eubanks D; Petrik A; Stevens VJ
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 17327250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Standardized audiotape versus recorded consultation to enhance informed consent to a clinical trial in breast oncology.
    Hack TF; Whelan T; Olivotto IA; Weir L; Bultz BD; Magwood B; Ashbury F; Brady J
    Psychooncology; 2007 Apr; 16(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 16906625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast cancer research: affecting the future.
    Barbera FN; Hardwick L
    Nurse Pract Forum; 1999 Sep; 10(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 10614363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Information about cancer clinical trials: an analysis of Internet resources.
    Carden CP; Jefford M; Rosenthal MA
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Jul; 43(10):1574-80. PubMed ID: 17544266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What difference does it make to be treated in a clinical trial? A pilot study.
    Weijer C; Freedman B; Fuks A; Robbins J; Shapiro S; Skrutkowska M
    Clin Invest Med; 1996 Jun; 19(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 8724821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Internet based multi-institutional clinical research: a convenient and secure option.
    Lallas CD; Preminger GM; Pearle MS; Leveillee RJ; Lingeman JE; Schwope JP; Pietrow PK; Auge BK
    J Urol; 2004 May; 171(5):1880-5. PubMed ID: 15076298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Decision-making and breast cancer clinical trials: how experience challenges attitudes.
    Mancini J; Genève J; Dalenc F; Genre D; Monnier A; Kerbrat P; Largillier R; Serin D; Rios M; Roché H; Jimenez M; Tarpin C; ; Julian Reynier C
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Nov; 28(6):684-94. PubMed ID: 17434812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Organizational barriers to physician participation in cancer clinical trials.
    Somkin CP; Altschuler A; Ackerson L; Geiger AM; Greene SM; Mouchawar J; Holup J; Fehrenbacher L; Nelson A; Glass A; Polikoff J; Tishler S; Schmidt C; Field T; Wagner E
    Am J Manag Care; 2005 Jul; 11(7):413-21. PubMed ID: 16044978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Illness stories on the internet: what do breast cancer patients want at the end of treatment?
    Overberg RI; Alpay LL; Verhoef J; Zwetsloot-Schonk JH
    Psychooncology; 2007 Oct; 16(10):937-44. PubMed ID: 17274107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Barriers in phase I cancer clinical trials referrals and enrollment: five-year experience at the Princess Margaret Hospital.
    Ho J; Pond GR; Newman C; Maclean M; Chen EX; Oza AM; Siu LL
    BMC Cancer; 2006 Nov; 6():263. PubMed ID: 17092349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical trial accrual among new cancer patients at a community-based cancer center.
    Go RS; Frisby KA; Lee JA; Mathiason MA; Meyer CM; Ostern JL; Walther SM; Schroeder JE; Meyer LA; Umberger KE
    Cancer; 2006 Jan; 106(2):426-33. PubMed ID: 16353206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of an interactive web-based questionnaire to evaluate a breast cancer website.
    Teo NB; Paton P; Kettlewell S
    Breast; 2005 Apr; 14(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 15767186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A tale of two studies: the importance of setting, subjects and context in two randomized, controlled trials of a web-based decision support for perimenopausal and postmenopausal health decisions.
    Saver BG; Gustafson D; Taylor TR; Hawkins RP; Woods NF; Dinauer S; Casey S; MacLaren-Loranger A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 May; 66(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 17317080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does increased patient awareness improve accrual into cancer-related clinical trials?
    Stiles CR; Johnson L; Whyte D; Nergaard TH; Gardner J; Wu J
    Cancer Nurs; 2011; 34(5):E13-9. PubMed ID: 21252642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Enrollment of elderly patients in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: a 7-year experience by the US Food and Drug Administration.
    Talarico L; Chen G; Pazdur R
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Nov; 22(22):4626-31. PubMed ID: 15542812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [How to improve patients and investigators' information on clinical trials: the example of French registry for clinical trials in oncology].
    Pauporté I; Manach E; Bachouche N; Hommais A; Détry S; Legrand-Lane C; Barbare JC
    Bull Cancer; 2008 Dec; 95(12):1227-32. PubMed ID: 19091658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A descriptive study comparing health attitudes of urban and rural oncology patients.
    Howat A; Veitch C; Cairns W
    Rural Remote Health; 2006; 6(4):563. PubMed ID: 17017848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings?
    Magrabi F; Westbrook JI; Coiera EW
    Int J Med Inform; 2007 Oct; 76(10):701-9. PubMed ID: 16893677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial.
    Glasgow RE; Nelson CC; Kearney KA; Reid R; Ritzwoller DP; Strecher VJ; Couper MP; Green B; Wildenhaus K
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 May; 9(2):e11. PubMed ID: 17513282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.