186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16849689)
1. A modification to the flow method to estimate completeness in cancer registries with delayed registration.
Montanaro F; Robinson D; Bordoni A; Lutz JM
J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Sep; 28(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 16849689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Completeness of ascertainment by cancer registries: putting bounds on the number of missing cases.
Silcocks PB; Robinson D
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 15284320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Relation of breast cancer tumour stage and the degree of registration in a population-based cancer registry].
Katalinic A; Holzmann M; Kunze U
Gesundheitswesen; 2003; 65(8-9):509-15. PubMed ID: 14505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating completeness in cancer registries--comparing capture-recapture methods in a simulation study.
Schmidtmann I
Biom J; 2008 Dec; 50(6):1077-92. PubMed ID: 19067337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Danish Cancer Registry--history, content, quality and use.
Storm HH; Michelsen EV; Clemmensen IH; Pihl J
Dan Med Bull; 1997 Nov; 44(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 9408738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Ten years of epidemiological cancer registration in Bavaria].
Meyer M; Opitz T; Caselmann WH; Schenkirsch G; Maisel T; Petsch S; Engel J; Schubert-Fritschle G; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Mäder U; Göbel-Lissowsky M; Hölzel D
Gesundheitswesen; 2009 May; 71(5):293-8. PubMed ID: 19326333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Index for evaluating completeness of registration in population-based cancer registries and estimation of registration rate at the Osaka Cancer Registry between 1966 and 1992 using this index].
Ajiki W; Tsukuma H; Oshima A
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1998 Oct; 45(10):1011-7. PubMed ID: 9893469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mathematical estimation of true cancer incidence using data from population-based cancer registries.
Kamo K; Kaneko S; Satoh K; Yanagihara H; Mizuno S; Sobue T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Feb; 37(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 17272318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.
Parkin DM; Bray F
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 19128954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison with manual registration reveals satisfactory completeness and efficiency of a computerized cancer registration system.
Contiero P; Tittarelli A; Maghini A; Fabiano S; Frassoldi E; Costa E; Gada D; Codazzi T; Crosignani P; Tessandori R; Tagliabue G
J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 17452020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of completeness of case ascertainment of Austrian cancer incidence data using the flow method.
Hackl M; Waldhoer T
Eur J Public Health; 2013 Oct; 23(5):889-93. PubMed ID: 23002230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of childhood cancer in Switzerland: the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry.
Michel G; von der Weid NX; Zwahlen M; Redmond S; Strippoli MP; Kuehni CE;
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2008 Jan; 50(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 17226849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Up-to-date estimates of cancer patient survival even with common latency in cancer registration.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Sep; 15(9):1727-32. PubMed ID: 16985036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Is registration of multiple myeloma in the Norwegian Cancer Registry good enough?].
Aasbrenn M; Langmark F; Wisløff F
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Dec; 128(23):2712-4. PubMed ID: 19079417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Registration completeness and tumour-node-metastases category distribution in prostatic and testicular cancer in Bavaria.
Radespiel-Tröger M; Geiss K; Gärtig-Daugs A; Meyer M
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 18414194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.
Bray F; Parkin DM
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 19117750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determinants and interpretation of death certificate only proportions in the initial years of newly established cancer registries.
Brenner H; Jansen L
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 23084081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Problems in using birth certificate files in the capture-recapture model to estimate the completeness of case ascertainment in a population-based birth defects registry in New York State.
Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK; Hwang SA; Gensburg LJ
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 17044070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of completeness of case ascertainment in Swiss cancer registration.
Lorez M; Bordoni A; Bouchardy C; Bulliard JL; Camey B; Dehler S; Frick H; Konzelmann I; Maspoli M; Mousavi SM; Rohrmann S; Arndt V
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2017 Sep; 26 Joining forces for better cancer registration in Europe():S139-S146. PubMed ID: 28574868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [An estimation of the national cancer incidence in Korea for 2000-2002 using the databases of 8 population-based regional cancer registries].
Community of Population-based Regional Cancer Registries in Korea
J Prev Med Public Health; 2008 Nov; 41(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 19037167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
