751 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16850647)
1. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.
Nanta P; Senarat W; Tribuddharat C; Danchaivijitr S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
Yimyam S; Srisuphan W; Plianpadung S; Senaratana W
J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cost analysis of reusable and disposable flexible optical scopes for intubation.
Tvede MF; Kristensen MS; Nyhus-Andreasen M
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 May; 56(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 22338623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cost analysis comparing single-use (Ambu® aScope™) and conventional reusable fiberoptic flexible scopes for difficult tracheal intubation].
Aïssou M; Coroir M; Debes C; Camus T; Hadri N; Gutton C; Beaussier M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 May; 32(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 23561716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages of reusable accessories.
Wolfsen HC
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 10683220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sterilizable syringes: excessive risk or cost-effective option?
Battersby A; Feilden R; Nelson C
Bull World Health Organ; 1999; 77(10):812-9. PubMed ID: 10593029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of costs for disposable and reusable syringes and needles in Siriraj Hospital.
Danchaivijitr S; Chuenarom W; Kachintorn K; Tangtrakul T
J Med Assoc Thai; 1992 Mar; 75 Suppl 2():11-5. PubMed ID: 1402493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reusable, re-posable and disposable instrumentation.
Melzer A; Buess G
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):127-8. PubMed ID: 7552127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Risky recycling: that "disposable" catheter may have been used before.
Hawkins D
US News World Rep; 1999 Sep; 127(11):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 10621509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hazards associated with the use of a disposable reinforced tracheal tube.
Ismail S; Khan FA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Mar; 15(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 15808108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Multipatient use of prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers for up to 30 days: patient safety and cost analysis.
Golar SD; Sutherland LL; Ford GT
Respir Care; 1993 Apr; 38(4):343-7. PubMed ID: 10145893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.
Petersen BT
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 10683219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation.
Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Re-sterilization of disposable products: a gamble].
Haindl H
Pflege Z; 2002 Feb; 55(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12640997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C
ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
Swem T; Fazzalari R
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 7552128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The precautionary principle: what is the risk of reusing disposable drops in routine ophthalmology consultations and what are the costs of reducing this risk to zero?
Somner JE; Cavanagh DJ; Wong KK; Whitelaw M; Thomson T; Mansfield D
Eye (Lond); 2010 Feb; 24(2):361-3. PubMed ID: 19521427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing the risk of unsafe injections in immunization programmes: financial and operational implications of various injection technologies.
Aylward B; Lloyd J; Zaffran M; McNair-Scott R; Evans P
Bull World Health Organ; 1995; 73(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 7554027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
