These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

752 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16850647)

  • 21. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cost-effectiveness analysis of flexible optical scopes for tracheal intubation: a descriptive comparative study of reusable and single-use scopes.
    Gupta D; Wang H
    J Clin Anesth; 2011 Dec; 23(8):632-5. PubMed ID: 22137515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Disposable and reusable trocars.
    Watson DI
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Disposable vs reusable laryngeal mask airway: a cost-minimization analysis].
    Soulias M; Martin L; Garnier N; Juniot A; Aho LS; Freysz M
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2006 Aug; 25(8):811-4. PubMed ID: 16603333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biopsy forceps: disposable or reusable?
    Muscarella LF
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001; 24(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Guidelines for the choice of disposable and reusable medical equipment. The Hospital Infection Control Group of Thailand.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 2():S132. PubMed ID: 7561591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs.
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing the cost of reusable and disposable packs.
    MacLean C
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Feb; 3(2):24-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10131599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reuse of single-use devices.
    Schröer P
    Med Device Technol; 2000 Dec; 11(10):44, 48-53. PubMed ID: 11200156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Open and closed endotracheal suction systems in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients: a meta-analysis.
    Jongerden IP; Rovers MM; Grypdonck MH; Bonten MJ
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):260-70. PubMed ID: 17133187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reusable biopsy forceps: a cost-effective measure for the endoscopy suite.
    Raltz SL; Kozarek RA; Pethigal PA; Moorhouse MA; Merriam LD
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 1995; 18(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 7578296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs.
    Hickey M; Fields M
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Do costs decide? Disposable or reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?].
    Lefering R; Troidl H; Ure BM
    Chirurg; 1994 Apr; 65(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 8020351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cost comparison of re-usable and single-use fibrescopes in a large English teaching hospital.
    McCahon RA; Whynes DK
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Jun; 70(6):699-706. PubMed ID: 25644476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Disposable versus reusable instrumentation.
    Maddern GJ; Bessell JR
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):125-6. PubMed ID: 7552126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A comparative cost analysis of single-use versus reusable fiberoptic bronchoscopes: Is single-use fiberscope worth it?].
    Videau M; Rghioui K; Mottet B; Sainfort A; Lefort I
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2017 Nov; 75(6):473-479. PubMed ID: 28818319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Should disposable products be reused? The "re-user" takes big risks].
    Liedström G
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Jan; 93(1-2):41-2. PubMed ID: 8544531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Frequency of changing suction canisters and suction tubing: a descriptive study.
    Hannah J; Craddock S
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2007; 30(5):332-6. PubMed ID: 18049201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adventures in recycling: the reuse of "disposable" pulse oximeter probes.
    Salyer JW; Burton K; Lynch J; Ballard J; Keenan J
    Respir Care; 1993 Oct; 38(10):1072-6. PubMed ID: 10145890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits.
    McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 22492185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.