These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16854793)

  • 21. Application of immersed MF (IMF) followed by reverse osmosis (RO) membrane for wastewater reclamation: A case study in Malaysia.
    Ujang Z; Ng KS; Tg Hamzah TH; Roger P; Ismail MR; Shahabudin SM; Abdul Hamid MH
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):103-8. PubMed ID: 18025737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Capillary nanofiltration coupled with powdered activated carbon adsorption for high quality water reuse.
    Kazner C; Meier J; Wintgens T; Melin T
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(1):251-9. PubMed ID: 19587422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization.
    Akhondi E; Wu B; Sun S; Marxer B; Lim W; Gu J; Liu L; Burkhardt M; McDougald D; Pronk W; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2015 Mar; 70():158-73. PubMed ID: 25528546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Treatment of phosphate-containing oily wastewater by coagulation and microfiltration.
    Zhang J; Sun YX; Huang ZF; Liu XQ; Meng GY
    J Environ Sci (China); 2006; 18(4):629-33. PubMed ID: 17078536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimization of protein fractionation by skim milk microfiltration: Choice of ceramic membrane pore size and filtration temperature.
    Jørgensen CE; Abrahamsen RK; Rukke EO; Johansen AG; Schüller RB; Skeie SB
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6164-6179. PubMed ID: 27265169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of microfiltration performance with constant flux processing of secondary effluent.
    Parameshwaran K; Fane AG; Cho BD; Kim KJ
    Water Res; 2001 Dec; 35(18):4349-58. PubMed ID: 11763037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
    Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treatment of the methanogenic landfill leachate with thin open channel reverse osmosis membrane modules.
    Li F; Wichmann K; Heine W
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):960-4. PubMed ID: 18693005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Membrane foulants and fouling mechanisms in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of an activated sludge effluent.
    Nguyen ST; Roddick FA; Harris JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1975-83. PubMed ID: 21045321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of membrane fouling for in-line filtration of oil sands process-affected water: the effects of pretreatment conditions.
    Kim ES; Liu Y; Gamal El-Din M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):2877-84. PubMed ID: 22279959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A process efficiency assessment of serum protein removal from milk using ceramic graded permeability microfiltration membrane.
    Tremblay-Marchand D; Doyen A; Britten M; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jul; 99(7):5230-5243. PubMed ID: 27132105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of cross-flow microfiltration for removal of microorganisms associated with unpasteurized liquid egg white from process plant.
    Mukhopadhyay S; Tomasula PM; Van Hekken D; Luchansky JB; Call JE; Porto-Fett A
    J Food Sci; 2009 Aug; 74(6):M319-27. PubMed ID: 19723218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fouling resilient perforated feed spacers for membrane filtration.
    Kerdi S; Qamar A; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ghaffour N
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 140():211-219. PubMed ID: 29715645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
    Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimization of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration process for seawater pretreatment.
    Wu B; Hochstrasser F; Akhondi E; Ambauen N; Tschirren L; Burkhardt M; Fane AG; Pronk W
    Water Res; 2016 Apr; 93():133-140. PubMed ID: 26900974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Determining factors on the steady operation of immersed membrane process].
    Han HD; Wang DS; Gu P; Lü XL
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2008 Oct; 29(10):2773-6. PubMed ID: 19143369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of pore size, shear rate, and harvest time during the constant permeate flux microfiltration of CHO cell culture supernatant.
    Stressmann M; Moresoli C
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(4):890-7. PubMed ID: 19194898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Membranes coupled with physico chemical treatment in water reuse.
    Guo WS; Zhang R; Vigneswaran S; Ngo HH; Kandasamy J
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(2):513-9. PubMed ID: 20107279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performances and fouling control of a flat sheet membrane in a MBR pilot-plant.
    Grélot A; Grelier P; Tazi-Pain A; Lesjean B; Brüss U; Grasmick A
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2185-92. PubMed ID: 20418613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Separation of water from metal working emulsions by ultrafiltration using vibratory membranes.
    Moulai-Mostefa N; Frappart M; Akoum O; Ding L; Jaffrin MY
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 May; 177(1-3):978-82. PubMed ID: 20097000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.