These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16854793)

  • 41. Improved performance of gravity-driven membrane filtration for seawater pretreatment: Implications of membrane module configuration.
    Wu B; Christen T; Tan HS; Hochstrasser F; Suwarno SR; Liu X; Chong TH; Burkhardt M; Pronk W; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2017 May; 114():59-68. PubMed ID: 28226250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Microfiltration for separation of green algae from water.
    Hung MT; Liu JC
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2006 Aug; 51(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 16914295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Membrane fouling controlled by coagulation/adsorption during direct sewage membrane filtration (DSMF) for organic matter concentration.
    Gong H; Jin Z; Wang X; Wang K
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Jun; 32():1-7. PubMed ID: 26040725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of Microcystis aeruginosa on membrane fouling in a biologically treated effluent.
    Goh YT; Harris JL; Roddick FA
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(12):2853-9. PubMed ID: 22049710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of operation parameters on the flux stabilization of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration system for decentralized water supply.
    Tang X; Ding A; Qu F; Jia R; Chang H; Cheng X; Liu B; Li G; Liang H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Aug; 23(16):16771-80. PubMed ID: 27189452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pharmaceuticals and pesticides in reclaimed water: Efficiency assessment of a microfiltration-reverse osmosis (MF-RO) pilot plant.
    Rodriguez-Mozaz S; Ricart M; Köck-Schulmeyer M; Guasch H; Bonnineau C; Proia L; de Alda ML; Sabater S; Barceló D
    J Hazard Mater; 2015 Jan; 282():165-73. PubMed ID: 25269743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of soluble calcium and lactose on limiting flux and serum protein removal during skim milk microfiltration.
    Adams MC; Hurt EE; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):7483-97. PubMed ID: 26298759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Biomass characteristics and membrane aeration: toward a better understanding of membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs).
    Germain E; Stephenson T; Pearce P
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 15800864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Intermittent operation of low pressure UF membranes for sewage reuse at household level.
    Diamantis VI; Anagnostopoulos K; Melidis P; Ntougias S; Aivasidis A
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 23985509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Particle and microorganism removal in floating plastic media coupled with microfiltration membrane for surface water treatment.
    Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Kornboonraksa T; Dumrongsukit C; Threedeach S; Ngo HH; Vigneswaran S
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(10):93-100. PubMed ID: 16104410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impact of anti-scalant on fouling of reverse osmosis membranes in reclamation of secondary effluent.
    Qin JJ; Wai MN; Oo MH; Kekre KA; Seah H
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(11):2767-74. PubMed ID: 19934497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Direct sewage up-concentration by submerged aerated and vibrated membranes.
    Mezohegyi G; Bilad MR; Vankelecom IF
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Aug; 118():1-7. PubMed ID: 22695138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Optimisation of combined coagulation and microfiltration for water treatment.
    Judd SJ; Hillis P
    Water Res; 2001 Aug; 35(12):2895-904. PubMed ID: 11471689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
    Bellona C; Drewes JE
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Resources and nutrients oriented greywater treatment for non-potable reuses.
    Li F; Behrendt J; Wichmann K; Otterpohl R
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):1901-7. PubMed ID: 18587176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Performance of an extended aeration-microfiltration (EAM) reactor in treating high strength industrial wastewater.
    Noor MJ; Muyibi SA; Ahmed T; Ghazall AH; Jusoh A; Idris A; Ahmadun FR; Nagaoka H; Aya H
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(9):331-8. PubMed ID: 12448486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A real trial of a long-term non-fouling membrane bioreactor for saline sewage treatment.
    Bai P; Wang J; Chen GH
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(7):1519-23. PubMed ID: 21508559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation.
    Kim J; DiGiano FA; Reardon RD
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 17961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.