These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16855062)
1. Identification of latent variables in a semantic odor profile database using principal component analysis. Zarzo M; Stanton DT Chem Senses; 2006 Oct; 31(8):713-24. PubMed ID: 16855062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding the underlying dimensions in perfumers' odor perception space as a basis for developing meaningful odor maps. Zarzo M; Stanton DT Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):225-47. PubMed ID: 19304614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Sensory 3D Map of the Odor Description Space Derived from a Comparison of Numeric Odor Profile Databases. Zarzo M Chem Senses; 2015 Jun; 40(5):305-13. PubMed ID: 25847969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Odor classification: a review of factors influencing perception-based odor arrangements. Kaeppler K; Mueller F Chem Senses; 2013 Mar; 38(3):189-209. PubMed ID: 23329731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Data management in olfaction studies. Chastrette M SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1998; 8(3-4):157-81. PubMed ID: 9522474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Semantic Organization of the English Odor Vocabulary. Hörberg T; Larsson M; Olofsson JK Cogn Sci; 2022 Nov; 46(11):e13205. PubMed ID: 36334010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The language of smell: Connecting linguistic and psychophysical properties of odor descriptors. Iatropoulos G; Herman P; Lansner A; Karlgren J; Larsson M; Olofsson JK Cognition; 2018 Sep; 178():37-49. PubMed ID: 29763790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Categorical dimensions of human odor descriptor space revealed by non-negative matrix factorization. Castro JB; Ramanathan A; Chennubhotla CS PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73289. PubMed ID: 24058466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Odor identification: perceptual and semantic dimensions. Cain WS; de Wijk R; Lulejian C; Schiet F; See LC Chem Senses; 1998 Jun; 23(3):309-26. PubMed ID: 9669044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Expansive linguistic representations to predict interpretable odor mixture discriminability. Dhurandhar A; Li H; Cecchi GA; Meyer P Chem Senses; 2023 Jan; 48():. PubMed ID: 37262433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in structure-odor relationships. Chastrette M SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1997; 6(3-4):215-54. PubMed ID: 9487700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensory Characterization of Odors in Used Disposable Absorbent Incontinence Products. Widén H; Alenljung S; Forsgren-Brusk U; Hall G J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(3):277-282. PubMed ID: 28328646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-cultural application of the "Sniffin' Sticks" odor identification test. Shu CH; Yuan BC; Lin SH; Lin CZ Am J Rhinol; 2007; 21(5):570-3. PubMed ID: 17999792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Just noticeable differences in component concentrations modify the odor quality of a blending mixture. Le Berre E; Béno N; Ishii A; Chabanet C; Etiévant P; Thomas-Danguin T Chem Senses; 2008 Apr; 33(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 18304991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure-odor relationships: using neural networks in the estimation of camphoraceous or fruity odors and olfactory thresholds of aliphatic alcohols. Chastrette M; Cretin D; el Aïdi C J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 1996; 36(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 8576286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Different odor tests contribute differently to the evaluation of olfactory loss. Lötsch J; Reichmann H; Hummel T Chem Senses; 2008 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 17761724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in the odor quality of androstadienone during exposure-induced sensitization. Jacob TJ; Wang L; Jaffer S; McPhee S Chem Senses; 2006 Jan; 31(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 16280418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]