These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16855498)

  • 1. Complications of sclera-covered enucleation implants.
    Custer PL; McCaffery S
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006; 22(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 16855498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Custer PL; Kennedy RH; Woog JJ; Kaltreider SA; Meyer DR
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):2054-61. PubMed ID: 14522788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Porous orbital implants, wraps, and PEG placement in the pediatric population after enucleation.
    Wang JK; Liao SL; Lin LL; Kao SC; Tseng HS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 144(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 17499206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Donor sclera-wrapped acrylic orbital implants following enucleation: experience in 179 patients in the Netherlands.
    Jongman HP; Marinkovic M; Notting I; Koetsier L; Swart W; Schalij-Delfos NE; Bleeker J; Jager MJ; Luyten GP
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 26914660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevention of exposure of porous orbital implants following enucleation.
    Wang JK; Liao SL; Lai PC; Lin LL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 17109809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bovine pericardium versus homologous sclera as a wrapping for hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
    Arat YO; Shetlar DJ; Boniuk M
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 19(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 12918552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scleral wrap increases the long-term complication risk of bone-derived hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
    Toh T; Bevin TH; Molteno AC
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Nov; 36(8):756-61. PubMed ID: 19128381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of autogenous sclera as wrapping material in hydroxyapatite implantation.
    Yoon JS; Lew H; Kook KH; Lee SY
    Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 18849630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Porous polyethylene orbital implant in the pediatric population.
    Iordanidou V; De Potter P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):425-9. PubMed ID: 15364225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of vicryl mesh in 200 porous orbital implants: a technique with few exposures.
    Jordan DR; Klapper SR; Gilberg SM
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 19(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12544793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enucleation with unwrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants: a 15-year experience.
    Trichopoulos N; Augsburger JJ
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 21(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 16234693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases.
    Yoon JS; Lew H; Kim SJ; Lee SY
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):566-572.e2. PubMed ID: 17854900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (Bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients.
    Tabatabaee Z; Mazloumi M; Rajabi MT; Khalilzadeh O; Kassaee A; Moghimi S; Eftekhar H; Goldberg RA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 20829725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exposure rate of smooth surface tunnel porous polyethylene implants after enucleation.
    Mahoney NR; Grant MP; Iliff NT; Merbs SL
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014; 30(6):492-8. PubMed ID: 25369179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polytetrafluoroethylene as a wrapping material for a hydroxyapatite orbital implant.
    Kao LY
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jul; 16(4):286-8. PubMed ID: 10923976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exposure rates of wrapped and unwrapped orbital implants following enucleation.
    Li T; Shen J; Duffy MT
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Nov; 17(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 11766024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term follow-up of porous polyethylene spherical implants after enucleation and evisceration.
    Alwitry A; West S; King J; Foss AJ; Abercrombie LC
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17237682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration.
    Su GW; Yen MT
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 20(4):274-80. PubMed ID: 15266140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anterior surface breakdown and implant extrusion following secondary alloplastic orbital implantation surgery.
    Axmann S; Paridaens D
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 96(3):310-313. PubMed ID: 29220117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exposure rate of unwrapped hydroxyapatite orbital implants in enucleation surgery.
    Ye J; Gao Q; He JJ; Gao T; Ning QY; Xie JJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jun; 100(6):860-5. PubMed ID: 26483441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.