These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16856225)

  • 1. Attitudes towards sex selection for non-medical reasons: a review.
    Hall S; Reid E; Marteau TM
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):619-26. PubMed ID: 16856225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preconception sex selection: a survey of visitors to an internet-based health forum.
    Himmel W; Dahl E; Michelmann H
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Mar; 16 Suppl 1():18-26. PubMed ID: 18348786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the opposition.
    Baldwin T
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 16856230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitudes towards preconception sex selection: a representative survey from Germany.
    Dahl E; Hinsch KD; Brosig B; Beutel M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Dec; 9(6):600-3. PubMed ID: 15670402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attitudes towards sex selection in the Western world.
    Van Balen F
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):614-8. PubMed ID: 16856222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitudes about preconception sex selection: a focus group study with Americans.
    Kalfoglou AL; Scott J; Hudson K
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Dec; 23(12):2731-6. PubMed ID: 18765401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ethics of sex selection: a comparison of the attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians and physician providers of clinical sex selection services.
    Puri S; Nachtigall RD
    Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2107-14. PubMed ID: 19342036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical attitudes of German specialists in reproductive medicine and legal regulation of preimplantation sex selection in Germany.
    Wilhelm M; Dahl E; Alexander H; Brähler E; Stöbel-Richter Y
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56390. PubMed ID: 23437121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Community concerns about sex selection: research as a way forward - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
    McMahon CA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Mar; 8(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 15038893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex selection: regulating technology enabling the predetermination of a child's gender.
    Jones OD
    Harv J Law Technol; 1992; 6(1):1-62. PubMed ID: 16594114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.
    Dahl E; Beutel M; Brosig B; Grüssner S; Stöbel-Richter Y; Tinneberg HR; Brähler E
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2006; 23(7-8):311-8. PubMed ID: 16983516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ESHRE Task Force on ethics and Law 20: sex selection for non-medical reasons.
    Dondorp W; De Wert G; Pennings G; Shenfield F; Devroey P; Tarlatzis B; Barri P; Diedrich K
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1448-54. PubMed ID: 23578946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attitudes towards termination for fetal abnormality: comparisons in three European countries.
    Drake H; Reid M; Marteau T
    Clin Genet; 1996 Mar; 49(3):134-40. PubMed ID: 8737978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitudes of graduating medical doctors toward using sex selection techniques in Jordan in 2009.
    Khassawneh M; Al-Akour N; Khader Y; Zayed F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jul; 284(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 20706745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social and demographic dimensions of sex selection technologies: review and analysis of the research literature.
    Park S; Bowen WM; Steinbacher R
    Biodemography Soc Biol; 2012; 58(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 22582893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High and growing disapproval of sex-selection technology in Australia.
    Kippen R; Gray E; Evans A
    Reprod Health; 2018 Sep; 15(1):134. PubMed ID: 30185179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Millions of missing girls: from fetal sexing to high technology sex selection in India.
    George SM
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):604-9. PubMed ID: 16856224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons:a representative survey from Germany.
    Dahl E; Beutel M; Brosig B; Hinsch KD
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2231-4. PubMed ID: 14507848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Moral attitudes and beliefs among couples pursuing PGD for sex selection.
    Sharp RR; McGowan ML; Verma JA; Landy DC; McAdoo S; Carson SA; Simpson JL; McCullough LB
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Dec; 21(7):838-47. PubMed ID: 21051290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The obstetrician's view: ethical and societal implications of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis.
    Smith RP; Lombaard H; Soothill PW
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):631-4. PubMed ID: 16856227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.