These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16856228)
1. Regulating post-implantation fetal sex selection: a UK perspective. Newiss H Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):627-30. PubMed ID: 16856228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sex selection and abortion: a case for legal re-evaluation? McHale JV Br J Nurs; 2012 Mar 8-21; 21(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 22399004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexism and "the superfluous female": arguments for regulating pre-implantation sex selection. Danis J Harv Womens Law J; 1995; 18():219-64. PubMed ID: 11660528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal genetic screening: the enigma of selective abortion. Stoller D J Law Health; 1997-1998; 12(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 10182027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Legalization of prenatal determination of the sex of the fetus]. Czeizel E Orv Hetil; 1989 Mar; 130(10):541. PubMed ID: 2726235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-medical sex selection: ethical issues. Strange H; Br Med Bull; 2010; 94():7-20. PubMed ID: 20144937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forty years of legal abortion: now it's time to review the law. Furedi A J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2007 Jul; 33(3):147-8. PubMed ID: 17609069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sex selection and early pregnancy fetal sex determination: ethics and personal freedom of choice. Stephens JD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 166(3):1024-5. PubMed ID: 1550141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. From the editors. Kuhse H; Singer P Bioethics; 1993 Jul; 7(4):iii-. PubMed ID: 11651611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. India's problem with girls. Sachan D BMJ; 2013 Aug; 347():f4149. PubMed ID: 23990631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998-2007. Boland R; Katzive L Int Fam Plan Perspect; 2008 Sep; 34(3):110-20. PubMed ID: 18957353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Control of human sex ratios. Sex selection: a matter for 'fancy' or for ethical debate? Shenfield F Hum Reprod; 1994 Apr; 9(4):569. PubMed ID: 8046002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Why sex selection should be legal. McCarthy D J Med Ethics; 2001 Oct; 27(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 11579184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prohibition of sex selection for social reasons in the United Kingdom: public opinion trumps reproductive liberty? Herissone-Kelly P Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2006; 15(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 16862928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion, secular dogma, and the sacrament of sex: another failed attempt to impose moral idiosyncrasies through the ruse of argument. Trotter G Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):51-2. PubMed ID: 21161845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]