These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16856229)
1. 'Reproductive autonomy' versus public good? O'Neill O Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):646-7. PubMed ID: 16856229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The obstetrician's view: ethical and societal implications of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Smith RP; Lombaard H; Soothill PW Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):631-4. PubMed ID: 16856227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future. Davis DS Rutgers Law J; 1997; 28():549-92. PubMed ID: 12465646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Chance, choice and control: lay debate on prenatal social sex selection. Scully JL; Banks S; Shakespeare TW Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jul; 63(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 16459006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Millions of missing girls: from fetal sexing to high technology sex selection in India. George SM Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):604-9. PubMed ID: 16856224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In support of sex selection. Mamdani B Indian J Med Ethics; 2005; 2(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 16276627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For "Family Balancing". Shahvisi A J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):123-137. PubMed ID: 29368172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A feminist is a person who answers "yes" to the question, "are women human?": an argument against the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for gender selection. Downing KK DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(2):431-60. PubMed ID: 16538759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the "perfect child" of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women? Landau R J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):e10. PubMed ID: 18757610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human rights and human dignity in the resolution of certain ethical questions in biomedicine. Wheatley S Eur Hum Rights Law Rev; 2001; 3():312-25. PubMed ID: 12449971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical objections to sex selection for non-medical reasons. Blyth E; Frith L; Crawshaw M Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Mar; 16 Suppl 1():41-5. PubMed ID: 18348789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reproduction, rights and ethics]. Sundby J Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Dec; 125(24):3515-6. PubMed ID: 16357907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Permitting sex selection. Wilkinson M N Z Med J; 2009 Jun; 122(1296):90-1. PubMed ID: 19652689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sex selection and restricting abortion and sex determination. Zilberberg J Bioethics; 2007 Nov; 21(9):517-9. PubMed ID: 17927629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rights and procreative liberty. Schroeder D Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):325. PubMed ID: 17695626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach. Sedillo Lopez A Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex selection and the procreative liberty framework. de Melo-MartÃn I Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2013 Mar; 23(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 23678627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive autonomy and evolutionary biology: a regulatory framework for trait-selection technologies. Jones OD Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(3):187-231. PubMed ID: 8010304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1418-22. PubMed ID: 25956364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]