These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16856384)
1. [Theoretical analysis of changes in femoral stresses after total hip arthroplasty]. Yan S; Wu H; Yu S Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 23(3):530-4. PubMed ID: 16856384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty]. He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components]. Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduced bone stress as predicted by composite beam theory correlates with cortical bone loss following cemented total hip arthroplasty. Silva MJ; Reed KL; Robertson DD; Bragdon C; Harris WH; Maloney WJ J Orthop Res; 1999 Jul; 17(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 10459758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads. Little JP; Taddei F; Viceconti M; Murray DW; Gill HS Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 May; 22(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 17257719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction. Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC; Milroy JC Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (146):71-7. PubMed ID: 7371271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. THA loading arising from increased femoral anteversion and offset may lead to critical cement stresses. Kleemann RU; Heller MO; Stoeckle U; Taylor WR; Duda GN J Orthop Res; 2003 Sep; 21(5):767-74. PubMed ID: 12919861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique. Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant. Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calculated stress-shielding in the distal femur after total knee replacement corresponds to the reported location of bone loss. Tissakht M; Ahmed AM; Chan KC J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):778-85. PubMed ID: 8893772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Grochola LF; Habermann B; Mastrodomenico N; Kurth A Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18038142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of modular tapered fluted stems on proximal stress shielding in the human femur. Hnat WP; Conway JS; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Voor MJ J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 18848422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of computed finite element stresses to bone density after remodeling around cementless femoral implants. Skinner HB; Kilgus DJ; Keyak J; Shimaoka EE; Kim AS; Tipton JS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Aug; (305):178-89. PubMed ID: 8050227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Prediction of femoral remodeling after implantation of artifical femoral head]. Gao Z; Zhao C; Yu Q; Wu D; Yu J Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 20(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 12856602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Numerical investigations of the strain adaptive bone remodelling in the periprosthetic canine femur]. Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Wefstaedt P; Nolte I Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009; 122(9-10):391-7. PubMed ID: 19863012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement. Jonkers I; Sauwen N; Lenaerts G; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Jaecques S J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3405-13. PubMed ID: 19019372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoral strain changes after total hip arthroplasty--patient-specific finite element analyses 12 years after operation. Lengsfeld M; Burchard R; Günther D; Pressel T; Schmitt J; Leppek R; Griss P Med Eng Phys; 2005 Oct; 27(8):649-54. PubMed ID: 16139763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling. Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Changes of the bone mineral density of proximal femur after hip resurfacing arthroplasty]. Lian YY; Yoo MC; Pei FX; Cheng JQ; Feng W; Cho YJ; Kim GI; Chun SW Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 45(16):1091-4. PubMed ID: 18005605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study. Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]