177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16857909)
1. Women in science. MIT hiring controversy sparks faculty fracas.
Lawler A
Science; 2006 Jul; 313(5785):284. PubMed ID: 16857909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Women in science. Progress on hiring women science faculty members stalls at MIT.
Lawler A
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5772):347-8. PubMed ID: 16627703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Women science faculty at MIT.
Silbey RJ
Science; 2006 Jul; 313(5784):171. PubMed ID: 16840681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. academic research. MIT report finds 'breakdown' in neuroscience programs.
Lawler A
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5801):913. PubMed ID: 17095668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. higher education. Report finds no gender bias in faculty hiring, resources.
Mervis J
Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5932):1250-1. PubMed ID: 19498138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Careers in science. More women in science.
Handelsman J; Cantor N; Carnes M; Denton D; Fine E; Grosz B; Hinshaw V; Marrett C; Rosser S; Shalala D; Sheridan J
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5738):1190-1. PubMed ID: 16109868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Gender distribution of Canada Research Chairs.
Kondro W
Clin Invest Med; 2003 Feb; 26(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12659460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex and science.
Kantrowitz B
Newsweek; 2005 Jan; 145(5):36-8. PubMed ID: 17896719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Unruly democracy and the privileges of public intimacy: (same) sex spousal hiring in academia.
Nadeau C
J Lesbian Stud; 2005; 9(4):89-105. PubMed ID: 17548297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Harvard's women four years later.
Glimcher LH; Lieberman J
Nat Immunol; 2009 Jun; 10(6):559-61. PubMed ID: 19448653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Neuroscience. Big bucks for MIT brain center.
Lawler A
Science; 2002 May; 296(5571):1217. PubMed ID: 12016280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex and the university system.
Marks AR
J Clin Invest; 2005 Apr; 115(4):790. PubMed ID: 15841161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Academic couples: implications for medical school faculty recruitment and retention.
Girod S; Gilmartin SK; Valantine H; Schiebinger L
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Mar; 212(3):310-9. PubMed ID: 21296007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Fairness for women scientists and physicians: lessons from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)].
Zuber MA
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2001 Jan; 126(3):59-62. PubMed ID: 11205482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech transcript stokes opposition to Harvard head.
Singer E
Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7028):790. PubMed ID: 15729305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US science shocked by revelations of sexual discrimination.
Loder N
Nature; 2000 Jun; 405(6787):713-4. PubMed ID: 10864332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On hiring science faculty with education specialties for your science (not education) department.
Bush SD; Pelaez NJ; Rudd JA; Stevens MT; Williams KS; Allen DE; Tanner KD
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2006; 5(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 17146032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Canada. New research chairs mean brain gain for universities.
Kondro W
Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5600):1879. PubMed ID: 12471236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Academic leaders. Neuroscientist named MIT president.
Lawler A
Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5689):1389. PubMed ID: 15353771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Personnel dilemma.
Kaplan K
Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7236):372-3. PubMed ID: 19382331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
