220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16858722)
1. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis in the assessment of trainee competence in fetal biometry measurement.
Weerasinghe S; Mirghani H; Revel A; Abu-Zidan FM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 16858722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Continuous independent quality control for fetal ultrasound biometry provided by the cumulative summation technique.
Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Burkhardt T; Wisser J; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 20052663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement error for ultrasound fetal biometry performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh.
Neufeld LM; Wagatsuma Y; Hussain R; Begum M; Frongillo EA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 19504627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur.
Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 16289532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements.
Chan LW; Fung TY; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 19277977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.
Leung TN; Pang MW; Daljit SS; Leung TY; Poon CF; Wong SM; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usability of virtual-reality simulation training in obstetric ultrasonography: a prospective cohort study.
Burden C; Preshaw J; White P; Draycott TJ; Grant S; Fox R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 23303574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry.
Perni SC; Chervenak FA; Kalish RB; Magherini-Rothe S; Predanic M; Streltzoff J; Skupski DW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 24(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15476300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
Yang F; Leung KY; Lee YP; Chan HY; Tang MH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expected-value bias in routine third-trimester growth scans.
Drukker L; Droste R; Chatelain P; Noble JA; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):375-382. PubMed ID: 31763735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of fetal and parental factors on intrauterine growth measurements: results of the EDEN mother-child cohort.
Albouy-Llaty M; Thiebaugeorges O; Goua V; Magnin G; Schweitzer M; Forhan A; Lelong N; Slama R; Charles MA; Kaminski M;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 21438052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21
Cavallaro A; Ash ST; Napolitano R; Wanyonyi S; Ohuma EO; Molloholli M; Sande J; Sarris I; Ioannou C; Norris T; Donadono V; Carvalho M; Purwar M; Barros FC; Jaffer YA; Bertino E; Pang R; Gravett MG; Salomon LJ; Noble JA; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 52(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 28718938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learning curve for lung area to head circumference ratio measurement in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
Cruz-Martinez R; Figueras F; Moreno-Alvarez O; Martinez JM; Gomez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Gratacos E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 20131334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.
Dubiel M; Krajewski M; Pietryga M; Tretyn A; Breborowicz G; Lindquist P; Gudmundsson S
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Obstetric ultrasound scanning by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border.
Rijken MJ; Lee SJ; Boel ME; Papageorghiou AT; Visser GH; Dwell SL; Kennedy SH; Singhasivanon P; White NJ; Nosten F; McGready R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 19790099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of automated tool for two-dimensional fetal biometry.
Salim I; Cavallaro A; Ciofolo-Veit C; Rouet L; Raynaud C; Mory B; Collet Billon A; Harrison G; Roundhill D; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):650-654. PubMed ID: 30478919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry.
Peixoto-Filho FM; de Sá RA; Velarde LG; de Castro Mocarzel C; Lopes LM; Ville Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 22899306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Charts for fetal age assessment based on fetal sonographic biometry in a population from Cali, Colombia.
Briceño F; Restrepo H; Paredes R; Cifuentes R
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2135-43. PubMed ID: 24277896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
