BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16859301)

  • 1. Flexible docking of ligands into synthetic receptors using a two-sided incremental construction algorithm.
    Steffen A; Kämper A; Lengauer T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(4):1695-703. PubMed ID: 16859301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fully automated flexible docking of ligands into flexible synthetic receptors using forward and inverse docking strategies.
    Kämper A; Apostolakis J; Rarey M; Marian CM; Lengauer T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):903-11. PubMed ID: 16563022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FLEXS: a method for fast flexible ligand superposition.
    Lemmen C; Lengauer T; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 1998 Nov; 41(23):4502-20. PubMed ID: 9804690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site.
    Wei BQ; Weaver LH; Ferrari AM; Matthews BW; Shoichet BK
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 337(5):1161-82. PubMed ID: 15046985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An anchor-dependent molecular docking process for docking small flexible molecules into rigid protein receptors.
    Lin TH; Lin GL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1638-55. PubMed ID: 18642894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flexible docking using Tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity.
    Baxter CA; Murray CW; Clark DE; Westhead DR; Eldridge MD
    Proteins; 1998 Nov; 33(3):367-82. PubMed ID: 9829696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes.
    Cavasotto CN; Kovacs JA; Abagyan RA
    J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Jul; 127(26):9632-40. PubMed ID: 15984891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FLIPDock: docking flexible ligands into flexible receptors.
    Zhao Y; Sanner MF
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(3):726-37. PubMed ID: 17523154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved FlexX docking using FlexS-determined base fragment placement.
    Cross SS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):993-1001. PubMed ID: 16045293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A flexible approach to induced fit docking.
    Nabuurs SB; Wagener M; de Vlieg J
    J Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 50(26):6507-18. PubMed ID: 18031000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MolDock: a new technique for high-accuracy molecular docking.
    Thomsen R; Christensen MH
    J Med Chem; 2006 Jun; 49(11):3315-21. PubMed ID: 16722650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Docking of small ligands to low-resolution and theoretically predicted receptor structures.
    Wojciechowski M; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 11913386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A scoring function for docking ligands to low-resolution protein structures.
    Bindewald E; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Mar; 26(4):374-83. PubMed ID: 15651033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fully automated molecular mechanics based induced fit protein-ligand docking method.
    Koska J; Spassov VZ; Maynard AJ; Yan L; Austin N; Flook PK; Venkatachalam CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1965-73. PubMed ID: 18816046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The particle concept: placing discrete water molecules during protein-ligand docking predictions.
    Rarey M; Kramer B; Lengauer T
    Proteins; 1999 Jan; 34(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 10336380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 3. Impact of input ligand conformation, protein flexibility, and water molecules on the accuracy of docking programs.
    Corbeil CR; Moitessier N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):997-1009. PubMed ID: 19391631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.