These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16859357)
1. How ethics shape the policy preferences of environmental scientists: What we can learn from Lomborg and his critics. Balint PJ Politics Life Sci; 2003 Mar; 22(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 16859357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lessons learned from "the skeptical environmentalist": an environmental health perspective. Bodnar A; Castorina R; Desai M; Duramad P; Fischer S; Klepeis N; Liang S; Mehta S; Naumoff K; Noth EM; Schei M; Tian L; Vork KL; Smith KR Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2004 Jan; 207(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14762975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate. Yamamoto YT Public Underst Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):101-25. PubMed ID: 22530490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring Scientists' Values by Analyzing How They Frame Nature and Uncertainty. Vazquez M; McIlroy-Young B; Steel D; Giang A; Öberg G Risk Anal; 2021 Nov; 41(11):2094-2111. PubMed ID: 33598966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how. Nelson MP; Vucetich JA Conserv Biol; 2009 Oct; 23(5):1090-101. PubMed ID: 19459889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Keeping it Ethically Real. Ho D J Med Philos; 2016 Aug; 41(4):369-83. PubMed ID: 27256847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The nature and value of bioethics expertise. Vogelstein E Bioethics; 2015 Jun; 29(5):324-33. PubMed ID: 25256867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Politics and scientific expertise: scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy. Barke RP; Jenkins-Smith HC Risk Anal; 1993 Aug; 13(4):425-39. PubMed ID: 8234951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement. Cross B Bioethics; 2016 Mar; 30(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 26104240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of scientists in statutory interpretation of the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Wilhere GF Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):252-260. PubMed ID: 27601227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The nature of ethical expertise. Yoder SD Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(6):11-9. PubMed ID: 9868604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A model for teaching medical ethics. Welbourn RB J Med Ethics; 1985 Mar; 11(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 3884814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Theological ethics, moral philosophy, and public moral discourse. Jonsen AR Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1994 Mar; 4(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11645252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientists as experts: A distinct role? Gundersen T Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2018 Jun; 69():52-59. PubMed ID: 29857801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation. Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific authority in policy contexts: Public attitudes about environmental scientists, medical researchers, and economists. O'Brien TL Public Underst Sci; 2013 Oct; 22(7):799-816. PubMed ID: 24048622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]