539 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16859438)
1. Accuracy of deception judgments.
Bond CF; DePaulo BM
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
Bond CF; Depaulo BM
Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
Hartwig M; Bond CF
Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Being accurate about accuracy in verbal deception detection.
Kleinberg B; Arntz A; Verschuere B
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220228. PubMed ID: 31393894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Group discussion improves lie detection.
Klein N; Epley N
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7460-5. PubMed ID: 26015581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting deception in children: A meta-analysis.
Gongola J; Scurich N; Quas JA
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 27685642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unconscious processes improve lie detection.
Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R; Scharmach M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):721-39. PubMed ID: 24219784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can Ordinary People Detect Deception After All?
Ten Brinke L; Vohs KD; Carney DR
Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 20(8):579-588. PubMed ID: 27353575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning.
Horvath F; McCloughan J; Weatherman D; Slowik S
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 23406506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Applying the verifiability approach to deception detection in alibi witness situations.
Vernham Z; Vrij A; Nahari G; Leal S; Mann S; Satchell L; Orthey R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103020. PubMed ID: 32014621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting children's lies: comparing true accounts about highly stressful injuries with unprepared, prepared, and coached lies.
Warren KL; Dodd E; Raynor G; Peterson C
Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):329-41. PubMed ID: 22566366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use-the-best heuristic facilitates deception detection.
Verschuere B; Lin CC; Huismann S; Kleinberg B; Willemse M; Mei ECJ; van Goor T; Löwy LHS; Appiah OK; Meijer E
Nat Hum Behav; 2023 May; 7(5):718-728. PubMed ID: 36941469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: the boy-who-cried-wolf effect.
O'Sullivan M
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1316-27. PubMed ID: 15189591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is It the Judge, the Sender, or Just the Individual Message? Disentangling Person and Message Effects on Variation in Lie-Detection Judgments.
Volz S; Reinhard MA; Müller P
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Nov; 18(6):1368-1387. PubMed ID: 36791692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
Ten Brinke L; Lee JJ; Carney DR
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):560-578. PubMed ID: 30869984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.
Street CN; Richardson DC
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):342-55. PubMed ID: 26301728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fishy-looking liars: deception judgment from expectancy violation.
Bond CF; Omar A; Pitre U; Lashley BR; Skaggs LM; Kirk CT
J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Dec; 63(6):969-77. PubMed ID: 1460563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
