These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16860449)

  • 1. Static coefficient of friction between stainless steel and PMMA used in cemented hip and knee implants.
    Nuño N; Groppetti R; Senin N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):956-62. PubMed ID: 16860449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tribological behavior of artificial hip joint under the effects of magnetic field in dry and lubricated sliding.
    Zaki M; Aljinaidi A; Hamed M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(3):205-21. PubMed ID: 12883170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of femoral stem surface finish on the apparent static shear strength at the stem-cement interface.
    Zhang H; Brown LT; Blunt LA; Barrans SM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jan; 1(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 19627775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro investigation of friction at the interface between bone and a surgical instrument.
    Parekh J; Shepherd DE; Hukins DW; Hingley C; Maffulli N
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jun; 227(6):712-8. PubMed ID: 23636757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Static coefficient of friction between Ti-6Al-4V and PMMA for cemented hip and knee implants.
    Nuño N; Amabili M; Groppetti R; Rossi A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 Jan; 59(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 11745553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture toughness of steel-fiber-reinforced bone cement.
    Kotha SP; Li C; Schmid SR; Mason JJ
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Sep; 70(3):514-21. PubMed ID: 15293326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cemented fixation with PMMA or Bis-GMA resin hydroxyapatite cement: effect of implant surface roughness.
    Walsh WR; Svehla MJ; Russell J; Saito M; Nakashima T; Gillies RM; Bruce W; Hori R
    Biomaterials; 2004 Sep; 25(20):4929-34. PubMed ID: 15109853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotribological properties at the stem-cement interface lubricated with different media.
    Zhang HY; Luo JB; Zhou M; Zhang Y; Huang YL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Apr; 20():209-16. PubMed ID: 23518686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fatigue properties and stem subsidence in wire coil reinforced PMMA bone cement: a preliminary in vitro study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(6):453-62. PubMed ID: 9138655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ries MD; Young E; Al-Marashi L; Goldstein P; Hetherington A; Petrie T; Pruitt L
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 16039712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro friction of stainless steel arch wire-bracket combinations in air and different aqueous solutions.
    Al-Khatib S; Berradja A; Celis JP; Willems G
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2005 May; 8(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 15888122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Friction properties of the interface between porous-surfaced metals and tibial cancellous bone.
    Rancourt D; Shirazi-Adl A; Drouin G; Paiement G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Nov; 24(11):1503-19. PubMed ID: 2279983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single and reciprocal friction testing of micropatterned surfaces for orthopedic device design.
    Mitchell N; Eljach C; Lodge B; Sharp JL; Desjardins JD; Kennedy MS
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Mar; 7():106-15. PubMed ID: 22340690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Study of friction and loosening in hip endoprostheses].
    Dovzak Bajs I; Cvjetko I; Car D; Kokić V
    Acta Med Croatica; 2002; 56(4-5):151-5. PubMed ID: 12768893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Friction and wear properties of polymer, metal, and ceramic prosthetic joint materials evaluated on a multichannel screening device.
    McKellop H; Clarke I; Markolf K; Amstutz H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Sep; 15(5):619-53. PubMed ID: 12659132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polyurethane unicondylar knee prostheses: simulator wear tests and lubrication studies.
    Scholes SC; Unsworth A; Jones E
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):197-212. PubMed ID: 17183136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probabilistic analysis of the influence of the bonding degree of the stem-cement interface in the performance of cemented hip prostheses.
    Pérez MA; Grasa J; García-Aznar JM; Bea JA; Doblaré M
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(10):1859-72. PubMed ID: 16054633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcement of bone cement around prostheses by pre-coated wire coil: a preliminary study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 8000291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.