These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16860496)
1. Vibroacoustic stimulation in abnormal biophysical profile: verification of facilitation of fetal well-being. Papadopoulos VG; Decavalas GO; Kondakis XG; Beratis NG Early Hum Dev; 2007 Mar; 83(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16860496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of vibroacoustic stimulation during the abnormal or equivocal biophysical profile. Inglis SR; Druzin ML; Wagner WE; Kogut E Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 8355936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of vibroacoustic stimulation on fetal meconium passage in labor. Zimmer EZ; Talmon R; Makler-Shiran E; Jakobi P Am J Perinatol; 1996 Feb; 13(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 8672190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile. Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal habituation to vibroacoustic stimulation in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Smith CV; Davis SR; Rayburn WF; Nelson RM Am J Perinatol; 1991 Nov; 8(6):380-2. PubMed ID: 1814300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies. Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combination of vibroacoustic stimulation and acute variables of mFBP as a simple assessment method of low-risk fetuses. Petrović O; Finderle A; Prodan M; Skunca E; Prpić I; Zaputović S J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Feb; 22(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 19253163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal acoustic stimulation for rapid intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being. Tannirandorn Y; Wacharaprechanont T; Phaosavasdi S J Med Assoc Thai; 1993 Nov; 76(11):606-12. PubMed ID: 7964235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative of fetal surveillance]. Jiménez Solis G; Izquierdo Puente JC; Barraza Espinoza RM; Sánchez Tenorio E; García Alonso A Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1990 Oct; 58():284-8. PubMed ID: 2101378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing. Tan KH; Smyth R Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (1):CD002963. PubMed ID: 11279788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The role of vibroacoustic stimulation in antenatal fetal assessment]. Leis Marquez MT; Hernández Andrade E; Maya Goldsmit D; Pérez de la Huerta MI; López García RB Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1993 Dec; 61():356-9. PubMed ID: 8119607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prediction of fetal hypoxia using the fetal biophysical profile]. Urbánková E; Toldy M Cesk Gynekol; 1989 Dec; 54(10):733-9. PubMed ID: 2698277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment. Tongprasert F; Jinpala S; Srisupandit K; Tongsong T Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Oct; 95(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 16860803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing. Tan KH; Smyth RM; Wei X Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2013(12):CD002963. PubMed ID: 24318543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The correlation in antepartum fetal test between full fetal biophysical profile (FBP) and rapid biophysical profile (rBPP). Phattanachindakun B; Boonyagulsrirung T; Chanprapaph P J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jul; 93(7):759-64. PubMed ID: 20649052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation as a function of stimulus duration. Pietrantoni M; Angel JL; Parsons MT; McClain L; Arango HA; Spellacy WN Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):807-11. PubMed ID: 1923202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomised controlled trial of simple compared with complex antenatal fetal monitoring after 42 weeks of gestation. Alfirevic Z; Walkinshaw SA Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Aug; 102(8):638-43. PubMed ID: 7654642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal startle response observed under ultrasonography: a good predictor of a reassuring biophysical profile. Sarinoglu C; Dell J; Mercer BM; Sibai BM Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):599-602. PubMed ID: 8841226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]