These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16860803)

  • 1. The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment.
    Tongprasert F; Jinpala S; Srisupandit K; Tongsong T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Oct; 95(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 16860803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The efficacy of rapid biophysical profile in predicting poor pregnancy outcomes in suspected intrauterine growth restriction fetuses: preliminary study.
    Chousawai S; Tongprasert F; Yanase Y; Udomwan P; Tongsong T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Apr; 95(4):482-6. PubMed ID: 22611999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The correlation in antepartum fetal test between full fetal biophysical profile (FBP) and rapid biophysical profile (rBPP).
    Phattanachindakun B; Boonyagulsrirung T; Chanprapaph P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jul; 93(7):759-64. PubMed ID: 20649052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the intrapartum biophysical profile useful?
    Kim SY; Khandelwal M; Gaughan JP; Agar MH; Reece EA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 102(3):471-6. PubMed ID: 12962926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal acoustic stimulation for rapid intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Wacharaprechanont T; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1993 Nov; 76(11):606-12. PubMed ID: 7964235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The rapid biophysical profile for assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tongsong T; Piyamongkol W; Anantachote A; Pulphutapong K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1999 Dec; 25(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 10680342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized clinical trial of the intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid volume: amniotic fluid index versus the single deepest pocket technique.
    Moses J; Doherty DA; Magann EF; Chauhan SP; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1564-9; discussion 1569-70. PubMed ID: 15284736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting poor neonatal outcome: a comparative study of noninvasive antenatal testing methods.
    Dubinsky T; Lau M; Powell F; Garcia J; Mastobattista J; Parvey HR; Sickler K; Maklad N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):827-31. PubMed ID: 9057543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of a modified biophysical profile for fetal acidemia in high-risk pregnancies.
    Compitak K; Pheungtavechok O
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S12-7. PubMed ID: 21213489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: distribution's role in predicting fetal outcome.
    Myles TD; Strassner HT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Nov; 80(5):769-74. PubMed ID: 1407913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study.
    Morris JM; Thompson K; Smithey J; Gaffney G; Cooke I; Chamberlain P; Hope P; Altman D; MacKenzie IZ
    BJOG; 2003 Nov; 110(11):989-94. PubMed ID: 14592583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Umbilical artery velocimetry in predicting perinatal outcome with intrapartum fetal distress.
    Ogunyemi D; Stanley R; Lynch C; Edwards D; Fukushima T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):377-80. PubMed ID: 1495692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antenatal fetal assessment using biophysical profile score.
    Begum F; Buckshee K; Pande JN
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1996 Aug; 22(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 9103656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the intrapartum biophysical profile useful?
    Krantz CA; Shaffer LE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 103(2):400; author reply 400. PubMed ID: 14754716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal measurement of amniotic fluid index in term pregnancies and its association with intrapartum fetal distress.
    Garzetti GG; Ciavattini A; La Marca N; De Cristofaro F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1997; 44(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 9415520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vibroacoustic stimulation in abnormal biophysical profile: verification of facilitation of fetal well-being.
    Papadopoulos VG; Decavalas GO; Kondakis XG; Beratis NG
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Mar; 83(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16860496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Ingardia CJ; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 6877682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.