These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16860859)

  • 1. Porosity of different dental luting cements.
    Milutinović-Nikolić AD; Medić VB; Vuković ZM
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):674-8. PubMed ID: 16860859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: the therapeutic range of different cement types.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Loher H; Kolbeck C; Trempler C; Stemplinger B; Kopzon V; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1187-93. PubMed ID: 18372038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement.
    Nomoto R; Komoriyama M; McCabe JF; Hirano S
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):972-8. PubMed ID: 15501326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection of luting agents, part 1.
    Jivraj SA; Kim TH; Donovan TE
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 34(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 16724470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Porosity in manually and machine mixed resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Covey DA; Ewoldsen NO
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(6):617-23. PubMed ID: 11699187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Porosity evaluation and pore size distribution of a novel directly placed ceramic restorative material.
    Geirsson J; Thompson JY; Bayne SC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):987-95. PubMed ID: 15501328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of dental luting cements from the viewpoint of cell recovery (in vitro)].
    Yokoyama K; Imai K
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Sep; 9(5):703-19. PubMed ID: 2133360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
    Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
    Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confocal laser scanning microscopic observations of secondary caries inhibition around different types of luting cements.
    Umino A; Nikaido T; Tsuchiya S; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 16296431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of luting cements on the compressive strength of Turkom-Cera all-ceramic copings.
    Al-Makramani BM; Razak AA; Abu-Hassan MI
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):33-40. PubMed ID: 18264523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Properties of encapsulated and hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement.
    Fleming GJ; Landini G; Marquis PM
    Am J Dent; 2002 Apr; 15(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 12092998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of heat release of various cement base materials during their setting.
    Panagiotouni E; Karanika-Kouma A
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1995; 38(1-2):45-50. PubMed ID: 7881266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.