These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16861527)

  • 1. Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer.
    Gatsonis C; Paliwal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):271-81. PubMed ID: 16861527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
    Rücker G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) and hierarchical SROC models for analysis of diagnostic test evaluations of antibody ELISAs for paratuberculosis.
    Toft N; Nielsen SS
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Nov; 92(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 19747743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods.
    Vamvakas EC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Aug; 122(8):675-86. PubMed ID: 9701328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
    Macaskill P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) analysis to diagnostic clinical testing.
    Rosman AS; Korsten MA
    Adv Med Sci; 2007; 52():76-82. PubMed ID: 18217394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome.
    Doebler P; Holling H; Böhning D
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):418-36. PubMed ID: 22582866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast masses: an SROC curve with fixed and random effects linear meta-regression models.
    Akçil M; Karaağaoğlu E; Demirhan B
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 May; 36(5):303-10. PubMed ID: 18418880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy].
    Moreno G G; Pantoja C T
    Rev Med Chil; 2009 Feb; 137(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 19543656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1237-56. PubMed ID: 12111876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 1): Analysis of the properties of a diagnostic test].
    Cerda L J; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Jun; 27(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 20737121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The challenge of systematic reviews of diagnostic and staging studies in cancer.
    Lyman GH; Djulbegovic B
    Cancer Treat Rev; 2005 Dec; 31(8):628-39. PubMed ID: 16225994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves using bivariate time-to-event models for interval-censored data.
    Hoyer A; Hirt S; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 29052956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of added value of diagnostic tests].
    Moons KG; van der Graaf Y
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(26):1256-61. PubMed ID: 10908955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.
    Tatsioni A; Zarin DA; Aronson N; Samson DJ; Flamm CR; Schmid C; Lau J
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. PubMed ID: 15968029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Campbell JM; Klugar M; Ding S; Carmody DP; Hakonsen SJ; Jadotte YT; White S; Munn Z
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):154-62. PubMed ID: 26355602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.