400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16861581)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of 2 techniques for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow.
Paletta GA; Klepps SJ; Difelice GS; Allen T; Brodt MD; Burns ME; Silva MJ; Wright RW
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1599-603. PubMed ID: 16861581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of the TightRope versus traditional docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique: kinematic and failure testing.
Lynch JL; Maerz T; Kurdziel MD; Davidson AA; Baker KC; Anderson K
Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1165-73. PubMed ID: 23636555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Docking Technique Versus Repair With Internal Bracing.
Bodendorfer BM; Looney AM; Lipkin SL; Nolton EC; Li J; Najarian RG; Chang ES
Am J Sports Med; 2018 Dec; 46(14):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 30403369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of the docking plus ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique compared with the docking technique.
McGraw MA; Kremchek TE; Hooks TR; Papangelou C
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 23193145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Restoration of the Ulnar Footprint vs Traditional Ulnar Tunnels in Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
Chang ES; Le AH; Looney AM; Colantonio DF; Roach WB; Helgeson MD; Clark DM; Fredericks DR; Nagda SH
Am J Sports Med; 2022 Apr; 50(5):1375-1381. PubMed ID: 34889687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using bisuspensory fixation: a biomechanical comparison with the docking technique.
Jackson TJ; Adamson GJ; Peterson A; Patton J; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1158-64. PubMed ID: 23548807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The modified docking procedure for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: 2-year follow-up in elite throwers.
Paletta GA; Wright RW
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1594-8. PubMed ID: 16832125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomechanical evaluation of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a novel technique for ulnar-sided fixation.
Morgan RJ; Starman JS; Habet NA; Peindl RD; Bankston LS; D'Alessandro DD; Connor PM; Fleischli JE
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jul; 38(7):1448-55. PubMed ID: 20442324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical comparison of 2 ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques.
Large TM; Coley ER; Peindl RD; Fleischli JE
Arthroscopy; 2007 Feb; 23(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 17276221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in throwing athletes.
Dodson CC; Thomas A; Dines JS; Nho SJ; Williams RJ; Altchek DW
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1926-32. PubMed ID: 16902233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The GraftLink ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison with the docking technique in both kinematics and failure tests.
Lynch JL; Pifer MA; Maerz T; Kurdziel MD; Davidson AA; Baker KC; Anderson K
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Oct; 41(10):2278-87. PubMed ID: 23940203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of the DANE TJ technique to treat ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency of the elbow.
Dines JS; ElAttrache NS; Conway JE; Smith W; Ahmad CS
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Dec; 35(12):2039-44. PubMed ID: 17703003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the biomechanical profile of the intact ulnar collateral ligament with the modified Jobe and the Docking reconstructed elbow: an in vitro study.
Ciccotti MG; Siegler S; Kuri JA; Thinnes JH; Murphy DJ
Am J Sports Med; 2009 May; 37(5):974-81. PubMed ID: 19270190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical Functional Elbow Restoration of Acute Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: The Role of Internal Bracing on Gap Formation and Repair Stabilization.
Bachmaier S; Wijdicks CA; Verma NN; Higgins LD; Greiner S
Am J Sports Med; 2020 Jul; 48(8):1884-1892. PubMed ID: 32453667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of 2 hybrid techniques for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.
Chronister JE; Morris RP; Andersen CR; Buford WL; Bennett JM; Mehlhoff TL
J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 39(10):2033-40. PubMed ID: 25194771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical Effect of Differential Tensioning on Suture-Augmented Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow.
Iannucci LE; Koscso JM; Castile RM; Lake SP; Smith MV
Am J Sports Med; 2023 Jan; 51(1):205-213. PubMed ID: 36412519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a suspension button fixation technique.
Lee GH; Limpisvasti O; Park MC; McGarry MH; Yocum LA; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):575-80. PubMed ID: 20028848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Graft diameter does not influence primary stability of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow.
Dargel J; Küpper F; Wegmann K; Oppermann J; Eysel P; Müller LP
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Mar; 20(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 25790750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Ulnar Tunnel Position in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
Dutton PH; Banffy MB; Nelson TJ; Metzger MF
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Dec; 47(14):3491-3497. PubMed ID: 31647881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Augmentation.
Narvaez MV; Nelson TJ; Youssefzadeh K; Limpisvasti O; Metzger MF
Am J Sports Med; 2022 Jul; 50(9):2508-2514. PubMed ID: 35722811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
