These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16862287)

  • 1. Control of attention by a peripheral visual cue depends on whether the target is difficult to discriminate.
    Macea DD; Abbud GA; Lopes-de-Oliveira ML; Fuga NB; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2006 Jul; 39(7):957-68. PubMed ID: 16862287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurement-induced attentional control settings.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    J Vis; 2003; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12678623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention to locations and features: different top-down modulation of detector weights.
    Baldassi S; Verghese P
    J Vis; 2005 Jun; 5(6):556-70. PubMed ID: 16097868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.
    Janczyk M; Reuss H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.
    Schoeberl T; Fuchs I; Theeuwes J; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):737-48. PubMed ID: 25520044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surprising depth cue captures attention in visual search.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1358-1364. PubMed ID: 28980191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The benefit of attention is not diminished when distributed over two simultaneous cues.
    Bay M; Wyble B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jul; 76(5):1287-97. PubMed ID: 24728649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?
    Cheal M; Lyon DR; Hubbard DC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Nov; 43(4):825-57. PubMed ID: 1775666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priming effects of a peripheral visual stimulus in simple and go/no-go tasks.
    Squella SA; Ribeiro-Do-Valle LE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2003 Feb; 36(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 12563528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions.
    Janczyk M; Berryhill ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):715-24. PubMed ID: 24452383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking by object substitution: dissociation of masking and cuing effects.
    Neill WT; Hutchison KA; Graves DF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 12075896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uniform connectedness and classical Gestalt principles of perceptual grouping.
    Han S; Humphreys GW; Chen L
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 May; 61(4):661-74. PubMed ID: 10370335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploiting degrees of inflectional ambiguity: stem form and the time course of morphological processing.
    Järvikivi J; Pyykkönen P; Niemi J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):221-37. PubMed ID: 19210092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.
    Koch I; Lawo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24163154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficiency of different cue types for reducing spatial-frequency uncertainty.
    Hübner R
    Vision Res; 1996 Feb; 36(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 8746229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.
    Santangelo V; Van der Lubbe RH; Belardinelli MO; Postma A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 16489435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The early facilitatory effect of a peripheral spatially noninformative prime stimulus depends on target stimulus features.
    Azevedo EL; Squella SA; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2001 Jun; 34(6):803-13. PubMed ID: 11378672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.